+1
3.5 Eco would probably be considered too big; it's supposed to be a replacement for V-8's
Would be nice to see an SVT version with the big one though. And AWD
+1. When I think of a small, turbo. AWD sedan built with performance in mind I think EVO and STI. If it was priced around 30k it could compete nicely. Too bad they wont bring over the Focus RS. Not AWD but deffinately a contender.
Probably would be a better deal money wise to have them bump up the n/a power of the 3.7 to around 345 and go AWD for under $36k w/leather and paddle shifting.
____________________________________
Blue '98 Cobra Coupe S/C #009 of total'98 run. Built 8/29/97(1 of 10w/black cloth) . ..***Updated 8-8-01- 3.1 pulley,3.1 FMU,42FMS injectors,255 intank, recal M/Air,K. Bell Boost A-Pump,Smog Pump eliminated, BBK LT's ,"Flows",offroad"H",3.73's/Auburn/Moser axles,Carbon Fiber D.S.,HPM "Mega Bite Jr.'s",etc.,etc.
Dynotuned 4/24/07 by Alternative Auto with new SCT Tune. 436 HP, 390TQ @10.6psi /6300rpm
May2003@ Norwalk "Smackdown" 12.4@120 (2.04 60ft) on Dunlop Street tires 3290lbs.
Probably would be a better deal money wise to have them bump up the n/a power of the 3.7 to around 345 and go AWD for under $36k w/leather and paddle shifting.
I was thinking the other day how nice it would be to have a 3.7 in a Fusion.
I always thought this would make a good SVT car. I've seen companies modify this car pretty good. Especially the one I just got hired for. Not that its for me. I would definitely see a market for these cars.
Wife has a '08 MKZ 4wd. Would be nice with more power and a proper gearbox. I'd consider one. She had a LS before that and likes the more nimble feel, but still room inside. Says SHO is too big now....
I've had a Contour SVT, Focus SVT and Cobra SVT. I liked them all.
Do something quick, though. We have a new grandson and she's talking about a Flex.
____________________________________
Dave Hester
03 CobraConv(traded)
2008 Roush 428R
Pro Challenge Mustang SCCA/SARRC SPU #14 www.rheacermotorsports.com
Last edited by David Hester; 06-25-2010 at 03:12 PM..
svt fusion with awd and 6 speed flappy paddle gearbox. 3.5 V6 OR eco-boost 4 banger (turbo v6 unlikely) and price it near $30k and id be all over it. for $40k?? no thanks. ill wait five years and grab one for $20k after they tank in resale value
if the MS6 was going for around $30k, and many people actually paid less, than there's no reason why they couldnt do similar with the fusion.
____________________________________
02 Sonic Blue SVT Focus (Sold)
03 Black 10th Anne Coupe (Sold)
2011 Stealth Black Ducati 848 Evo
2006 F150 Harley Davidson
the best part is that the mondeo design isn't what it'll be based off of, but what it will actually be! around the time mulally came aboard, ford announced they were combining many platforms, with the US fusion and the mondeo being one of those platforms.
Why not put the new 5.0 in the Fusion.If you want to get more power go with the new 5.0.
Can it be done and price it at 38K.
then add a paddle shifter to it with the automatic,& offer a 6 speed for the gear shifters.
Just wishing.
Why not put the new 5.0 in the Fusion.If you want to get more power go with the new 5.0.
Can it be done and price it at 38K.
then add a paddle shifter to it with the automatic,& offer a 6 speed for the gear shifters.
Just wishing.
Good luck squeezing the 5L horizontally between the strut towers
Has Ford or even the performance shops thought about bolting the SHO or F150 turbo's onto the current Fusion??
I would love to know!!!
Has anybody tried it.?!
Why not put the new 5.0 in the Fusion.If you want to get more power go with the new 5.0.
Can it be done and price it at 38K.
then add a paddle shifter to it with the automatic,& offer a 6 speed for the gear shifters.
Just wishing.
FPV...Australia...Boss 335...they get all the good stuff...
I think the problem is that the fusion is so small (low curb weight and power) the driveline would take too much tear up and redesign. They'll probably opt for a turbo 4 at most. After all, just like Porsche does not want the Cayman to be released as a faster car than the 911, I doubt ford would release a faster Fusion, vs. Mustang.
Your 3 years early, but I am hoping to be one of the first orders this summer
I'm still trying to figure out if I want the AWD though.. A part of me does, especially since I live in Montana, but the part of me that drives 16,000 miles+ a year doesn't due to the added initial cost, complexity, and drop of 2-3 mpg in gas mileage..
I think I'll take $1500 saved from not buying the AWD and buy a nice set of wheels for the summer and some blizzaks.
____________________________________
RON PAUL 2012
Your 3 years early, but I am hoping to be one of the first orders this summer
I'm still trying to figure out if I want the AWD though.. A part of me does, especially since I live in Montana, but the part of me that drives 16,000 miles+ a year doesn't due to the added initial cost, complexity, and drop of 2-3 mpg in gas mileage..
I think I'll take $1500 saved from not buying the AWD and buy a nice set of wheels for the summer and some blizzaks.
I liked the looks of the new fusion I saw at the Detroit auto show this month. I think it will draw more enthusiasts (with families) in addition to the existing fusion fans/customers.
Bottom line, they need to have a high performance model, put a direct injection turbocharged engine in a fusion rate it at 320 hp (more is welcome) (but underrate it so the advertised value should be wheel hp!).
Keep in mind a lighter Dodge Dart may be faster. with a 2.4 turbo motor (similar to the old SRT4) may still be faster depending on curb weight, drivetrain configuration (AWD vs. FWD, and FWD with limited slip torsen or one wheel peal,and torque steer from hell).
I think the AWD will an easier way to enhance traction, avoid wheel hop, and torque steer. Having FWD only may require Re-design of the front suspension to mitigate those items; and this may require too much unique sourcing issues. I really do hope they can use a limited slip either way though, torsen or similar. Lastly, with AWD they can have a pretty nice torque vectoring ESC system for those nasty whether days(similar to ford escape), this can also enhance dynamics at the limit on dry surfaces, a track mode would be a huge bonus. (as well as an off button)
I just can't believe their isn't already a vehicle out there yet!!! atleast the Focus ST (yet to be released) seems to be already a step in the right direction and I hope it will be a good contender vs. the dodge dart as well.
I too liked the new 2013 Fusion. The main problem I have with it is the lack of a V6. I drive a 2006 Mazdaspeed6 with 140+k miles. I'm kinda over the turbo 4 thing. I bought the MS6 because I wanted good mileage in a stylish and powerful car, but I'd prefer something more refined if possible.
At one extreme, I like the new style Focus because the 37-40 mpg would be spectacular with all of the driving I do. However, the 160 horsepower is a big letdown. The compact size also makes me pause.
At the other extreme, I've also considered the SHO, but the car is too heavy, with poor mileage and has an interior (where the extra size would be appreciated) that is disproportionally small compared to the titanic exterior.
Along comes the new Fusion. It's stylish, has much better fuel economy than my MS6, and certainly can't have less rear leg/footroom than an SHO (although Ford wouldn't let us sit in one in Detroit). No power numbers have been released for the top-of-the-line 2.0 ecoboost, but that engine makes 240 hp in the Explorer and Edge. My MS6 makes 270. Current fusion competitors from T,H, and K also make 265-275. Come on Ford. We're not all tree huggers.
Is it too much to ask to want a car at least as good or better in all catagories than the one I am replacing? If the only option is to give up something AND increase my depreciation expense at the same time, I'd rather just stick with my MS6.
____________________________________
Kenne Bell Supercharged 1996 Mystic Cobra