Yeah, the computer is a option. The computer truly is the cat's ass. Afr's, timing, boost, G's, tire pressure, shift light, dyno, cam phase, fuel pressure and air intake temps just to name a few things it does.
LSJ ion is a M90 that trapped 114+, food for thought.
Wow! Every week you post a vid of a cobalt ss. They may be quick little cars or whatever, but not quick enough to be entertaining to watch.
Just my two cents.
____________________________________ chris Stucki 01 bullitt with A-A intercooled vortech V2 SQ, magnafllow cat back and bassani x pipe.
Yeah, the computer is a option. The computer truly is the cat's ass. Afr's, timing, boost, G's, tire pressure, shift light, dyno, cam phase, fuel pressure and air intake temps just to name a few things it does.
LSJ ion is a M90 that trapped 114+, food for thought.
Thanks for the info.
The LSJ may trap 114 but needs the driver mod bad. I would say that Colbalt could be a 108mph car.
Cant believe the Ion pulled that hard Ive got a buddy thats running 19 psi on his 05 ss sc and he got pulled on by a stock tc ss today Maybe he should call Livernoise
____________________________________ Its stock for now(except for UPR O/R X, Bassani cat back and K&N. MGW orange
Wow! Every week you post a vid of a cobalt ss. They may be quick little cars or whatever, but not quick enough to be entertaining to watch.
Just my two cents.
with you on that on thought I was going to see something insane...I know my car is a POS but damn come on.
My problem is that cobalts are the biggest POS 1980s engineered crap on the planet. Yes the new turbo SS is quick (albeit wrong wheel drive). But I drove one and I swear it feels just like my grandmothers 1992 junker cavelier (although much faster). The doors feel like they have cement in them. You have to slam the crap out of them to get them to close. The interior is straight out of the 1990.
It's beyond me why GM can't build a decent small car. Focus and Civic are engineered and built light years better. It's just too bad neither one of them offer the big HP numbers like GM and Dodge has (had in Dodge's case) done.
My problem is that cobalts are the biggest POS 1980s engineered crap on the planet. Yes the new turbo SS is quick (albeit wrong wheel drive). But I drove one and I swear it feels just like my grandmothers 1992 junker cavelier (although much faster). The doors feel like they have cement in them. You have to slam the crap out of them to get them to close. The interior is straight out of the 1990.
It's beyond me why GM can't build a decent small car. Focus and Civic are engineered and built light years better. It's just too bad neither one of them offer the big HP numbers like GM and Dodge has (had in Dodge's case) done.
What do you expect from a cheap 20k car? I got to ride in one(SC one) awhile ago and I thought it was pretty damn impressive for what it is. The handling was WAY better then i expected.
My father has the last year the cavelier was built to drive back and forth to work(dont ask why) but the curent cobalt is leaps and bounds better then the previous. Interior was actually put together nicely
For a cheap ass Cobalt you cant ask for much more....
____________________________________
1. It is important to find a woman who works around the house, cooks and cleans.
2. It is important to find a woman who makes you laugh.
3. It is important to find a woman who is dependable, respectful and doesn't lie.
4. It is important to find a woman who's good in bed and who loves to have sex with you.
5. It is important that these four women never meet.
The cobalt ss is more like $25k. But I'm really just talking about the Cobalt platform (forget the SS engine because that is nice) versus the other small car platforms out there. The cobalt is junk. Seriouly, go out drive a focus, a cobalt, a civic, a mazda 3, etc. The cobalt is REALLY far behind those other vehicles. When I got in the 2009, I honestly thought I was in my grandmother's 1992 cavalier. And her cavalier was a peice of crap in 1992 by 1992 standards.