Results 1 to 25 of 34
Thread: Let the ecoboost modding begin!
08-21-2009, 10:20 AM #1
Let the ecoboost modding begin!
I just read a few articles in the various car magazines about the SHO taurus, Ecoboost flex, and the others.
One article in car and driver specifically mentioned the the small GT-12 honeywell turbos that produce 12LBS of boost, the lack of boost lag, and that there is no hint of noise from them.
So, it got me thinking about how much boost that motor could take, and what sort of modifications will give the best bang for the buck on them? More boost from the stock turbos? Larger turbos? Up pipes? Down pipes? And how much HP do you think the direct injection system can handle in its stock form? I wonder what larger turbos could be a bolt in replacement for those small honeywell units? One thing I didn't see in any article was whether or not it was intercooled. I wonder if this would be a good mod as well.
Oh, and don't these motors already have the capability to run on E85? If so, bring on more boost!
On a side note, it would be smart for the dyno tuners to start to get their feet wet with how to tune and work on Ford's direct injection system, because it will inevitably end up on the mustang and other fords.
The ecoboost motors make about 350HP and 350LB/Ft of torque. I wonder how much it would take to push that up to 400? Could it be as simple as a cold air intake, exhaust, and boost controller? 500? Could this be as simple as upgraded turbos and perhaps a larger intercooler with some fuel system mods? The ultimate question is, are these motors as open to modifications as the roots-blown cobra and lightning motors? If they are, it'll make these cars much cooler than they already are.
Could you imagine a 500HP AWD Taurus or Flex? I'll take one please.
HomerLincoln Aviator Longblock (NOW BUILT @ 10.5:1) | P1-SC Procharger | Front-Mount Intercooler | BBK Twin 65MM Throttle Body | gReddy Blowoff Valve | 42LB Injectors | Lightning 90MM Blow-Thru MAF | Morpheus 4" Powerpipe | Morpheus Blower-Brace | BBK O/R X Pipe | Mac Cat-Back | Y2K 00R Rims | Tremec 6-Speed | Pro-5.0 T-56 Shifter with 5-speed knob | Aluminum Driveshaft | Fidanza 11" aluminum flywheel | SPEC III clutch | Kauffmann Motorsports Tune | AEM Failsafe Wideband Gauge | Auto-Meter Triple A-Pillar Fuel PSI/Boost/Oil PSI gauges |
08-23-2009, 07:26 PM #2
One thing is the trans cant take much more than 365 crank hp (taurus SHO) thats why they limited the power to that, for reliability.
2004 Mercury Marauder - Eaton M112, Billetflow 3.4, Accufab SBTB + Plenum, 4.10's, Stainless Works LT's, AT2525T mufflers, FX-R projectors
12.1 @ 112.27mph
1996 Ford Bronco - 4" lift, 35" BFG A/T's, MH1 projectors
1985 BMW 745i - 18" Style 118's, Chipped, Bilstein HD's
15.7 @ 92mph
08-24-2009, 08:13 PM #3
The Ecoboost V6 was designed for over 400HP, they detuned it for the tranny.2003 Mach1 - RVIN 281CobraJet
MODS: MGW orange, Cobra 10AE rims, BBK catted X pipe, SCT X3, PHP spacer
JLT RAI, Stinger catback, FRPP 4.10, MARCH pulleys, CobraR P/S & alt. pulley, 90mm MAF
Waiting Install: FRPP Quadrant and adjuster
Saving to order: Alum. DS, FLSFCs
08-25-2009, 11:35 AM #4
^^^Well that sucks. I hope a stronger tranny is in the works. Just another reason why I never buy the first year run of ANY car reguardless of make or model. Takes a year or two to fix all the little problems.
08-26-2009, 09:05 AM #5
Brett Hinds is the advanced engine design and calibration manager for EcoBoostTM. Ford had a "live chat" with him recently where I asked him the following question:
Originally Posted by BlainestangOriginally Posted by Brett Hinds
Anyway, the chat was quite interesting. You can find the full transcript [ame="http://www.ecoboosttalk.com/showthread.php?p=791#post791"]HERE[/ame], if you're interested.1993 Mustang LX 2.3L Notch : Open-Track Project
2000 Mustang V6 5-speed : H/C
2001 Harley Davidson F-150 : Virtually stock
2009 MINI Cooper
08-26-2009, 10:57 AM #6
Let's take an 03 cobra or GT500 vs. a Mitsubishi Eclipse, for example. The 03 cobras and GT500's really exploded the mustang scene because they responded to mods better than most mustangs before them. The new generation of eclipse, on the other hand, did the exact opposite.
Anyways, a little off topic, but my point is that I hope ford engineered room for modifications in these motors.
09-02-2009, 11:43 AM #7
- Join Date
- January 2004
All manufactures build cars with "room for improvement". The cars a tuned to be safe in a huge variety of climates, and all parts are used to give durability over a long service life. Turbos are chosen to reach a specific output, but enough headroom is left so that the lifespan is not going to be compromised from the factory, nor when the car is driven at altitude. Therefore there will always be some extra flow in the stock units. You should be able to just have the stock housings machined and put in a new gt15 or gt25 chra as well.
I am sure they limit power on the transverse tranny becuase they are affraid of warranty claims from launching a heavy awd car over the 60k mile term.
What I was really wondering, is if they will put the 3.5 in the mustang, or if they will just replace the v6 with the EB 4 cyl when it becomes available.Grabber/white 2010 GT500
upper, lower, blah blah blah..
Kenne Bell 2.8 awaiting install
09-02-2009, 12:05 PM #8
I don't think that's too likely though. They'll probably keep the V6. According to Motor Trend, the Ecoboost V6 is rumored to be a year away. However, the ecoboost V6 creates a few conflicts with the V8 mustang. 1) The ecoboost motor in the SHO taurus makes upwards of 350HP, which is more than the V8GT! Would they up the power of the GT? 2) The V8 Mustang GT gets better city/highway mileage than the "eco" boost v6. According to Motor Trend, the SHO taurus with "eco" boost gets 17/25 city/highway MPG and the Mustang GT gets 18/26 city/highway. Nevertheless, this is such an insignificant amount, and the ecoboost might have better mileage in a mustang chassis because it's lighter and more aerodynamic than a big Taurus. However, the people that buy V6's for better economy vs. the V8's would have one less reason to get the V6.
It woud be funny if the "base" ecoboost V6 mustang would make more power than the GT V8 though! I don't think ford will let that happen.
09-02-2009, 12:30 PM #9
2) The V8 Mustang GT gets better city/highway mileage than the "eco" boost v6. According to Motor Trend, the SHO taurus with "eco" boost gets 17/25 city/highway MPG and the Mustang GT gets 18/26 city/highway.[/quote]
Like you mentioned, the Mustang would get MUCH better gas mileage than the Taurus does with the same engine.
- The Taurus SHO weighs 4300lb... 700-800lb more than an EcoBoost Mustang.
- The Taurus SHO is exclusively AWD.
09-02-2009, 01:14 PM #10
You're going to see an easy 500hp from the eb in the taurus sho.
09-02-2009, 01:16 PM #11
I can't wait.
09-02-2009, 01:45 PM #12
09-02-2009, 02:38 PM #13
09-02-2009, 03:26 PM #14
09-02-2009, 03:51 PM #15
Since it's AWD, it takes more abuse than a FWD or RWD car would, and that would limit its power potential. It'll be interesting to see what the trans can actually take.
Soon enough, there'll be someone in this very thread who posts about their broken transmission and what happened. I can't wait to hear about it.
But I really can't wait to hear about the stories about who can get the best 60 foot times at the drag strip. Someone's also going to post in this thread, whether it be good or bad, about installing a set of four M/T ET Streets on all four corners of their 500HP SHO.
09-02-2009, 03:56 PM #16
09-02-2009, 04:08 PM #17
It'll also be interesting to see what Ford (or even better the Aftermarket) does to fix any weak points in the coming years once they have been exposed.
09-02-2009, 06:41 PM #18
09-02-2009, 10:31 PM #19
These things look like they make really efficient power to me. And the 10:1 compression ratio has alot to do with efficient power and lack of turbo lag. I can see making 400 hp with up/down pipes, intake, tune, the basic bolt on type stuff. But after 400ish with the high compression ratio wont you have to run some sort of race gas to really prevent detonation?99 SVT Cobra, built, d1sc, 18#, MAC LT, Borla stingers, Mac O/R Prochamber, Pro-Motion t45, 4.10s, hoping for 600+
09-02-2009, 10:43 PM #20
09-03-2009, 10:17 AM #21
09-03-2009, 09:30 PM #22
by the time the V6EB mustang is released. there will be already a DOHC 5.0 cammer engine in the GTs now thats some options for the pony right there. somewhere in 2011 im pretty surehere supra supra.......
09-04-2009, 04:15 PM #23
- Join Date
- January 2004
I would rather have a TT 3.5L than the "cammer" in a gt anyways, but I don't think they would ever offer that car to fully replace the V8. I just also doubt them building both so close together power wise. That is a pitty IMHO. I would buy a 2011 3.5 tt mustang in a heart beat.
09-04-2009, 05:44 PM #24
I think it would be cool if the v6 ecoboost and the v8 were close in power output. That way the v6 isn't seen as quite of a step down as it is today. The v6 doesn't always have to be packaged as inferior to the V8. (Although I'll still always buy a V8).
In australia, they have the Ford Falcon that comes either with a 5.4 DOHC V8 or you can get it with a twin turbo straight 6. I think the 6 makes more power than the 5.4.
09-05-2009, 02:07 PM #25
I'm thinking that car could gain 40-50hp by adding a couple lbs of boost and freeing up some restrictions. I wouldn't buy a SHO to mod it, it's too heavy and the AWD will just limit what it's capable of even if you added larger turbos and the works.