Results 51 to 75 of 133
Thread: 6.2 F-150 vs Ecoboost F150
01-22-2012, 12:03 AM #51
My raptor weighed in at 6325 last time. Noone inside and 1/2 tank of gas96 Cobra
Both very fun toys
01-22-2012, 01:33 AM #52
I had a diesel, and got rid of it.
Here is a quote from pickuptrucks.com
The only opportunity Ford gave us to drive the 6.2 was in a drag-racing scenario with the F-150 Harley-Davidson truck, where we measured a zero to 60 mph time of 7.15 seconds – three-tenths of a second slower than the EcoBoost-powered F-150 FX2.
But 6 cyl direct injection turbo diesels have been around for how long? Grow up...
2001 Ford Lightning - Built Motor - Built Trans - 2.3 KB - Custom Interior - No Numbers - No Times - Garage Queen
1994 Cobra #2277 of 5009
1993 Gen 1 Lightning #5194
1968 Ford Mustang "Gold Nugget Special"
2015 Chevrolet Tahoe LTZ
2013 Audi S4
01-22-2012, 08:33 AM #53
I'll keep my dinosaur 2007 FX2 4 door 5.4L - It's paid for !!! and I live close to work so who cares about milege, and it's trouble free to date.
Last edited by R1Lello; 01-22-2012 at 08:38 AM.Black/Tungsten Coupe...2007 Shelby GT500..Custom Asanti w/ 325's!! and No sticking out!, TVS + other goodies, by Evolution Performance 659 rwhp. Evolution Stage 5, Car # 11 Limited Production? Yeah right so.....SOLD !!!
Welcome C6 Z06 !! now with PRC heads and a 'mild' cam
Coming Soon! - C7Zxx?? - just because I need one
Motorbikes-Too many to list
Ford F150 FX2 Daily Driver
01-22-2012, 11:05 AM #54
Not really, this is the first test i've seen where the 6.2 beat the ecoboost. But for a motor almost twice the size and with 51 more hp, it should be faster.
- Join Date
- August 2005
01-22-2012, 11:19 AM #55
01-22-2012, 11:51 AM #56
01-22-2012, 11:57 AM #57
I had an 04 4wd lariat and put 110000 on it. Not one problem with it with the exception of a rear sliding window motor going out at 14k. It was the most reliable vehicle I ever owned. 70k... Ok...
01-22-2012, 12:11 PM #58
If you think your going to get the same kind of reliability(especially after 160,000 miles) out of your Ecoboost than you would a cummins you got another thing coming. Its a wimpy gas engine compared to an industrial inline 6 that was built and designed for a life of work04 Cobra, Stiegemeier stage 5, 60#ers, Ford GT's in the tank
08 ZX14 stretched and lowered
11 Ram 1500 4X4
01-22-2012, 12:16 PM #59
01-22-2012, 12:44 PM #60
01-22-2012, 12:58 PM #61
ford master tech here.
eb has some issues already. front timing covers leeking, vct sticking, on and on. front trans pump seal leeking, burns up trans. some is to be expected. most complain about loud engine noise due to the injectors firing off at 2,000 psi.
so far no 5.0's or 6.2's i have seen in the shop for any engine issues.
also, i would never own a 5.4 3v way too many problems with them, most are due to lack of maintence though. same with 6.0's(sold) Black 03 Cobra coupe
11.84 at 117.55
02 ls1 a4
cam, bolt ons, faster than the cobra ;(
01-22-2012, 01:10 PM #62
01-22-2012, 01:18 PM #63
Diesels are fly by wire, I have no throttle body at all.
But i must agree it is BS that Diesel Gas cost more than premium fuel, it is ridiculous BUT I love my truck and would not trade it for gas at this point. Unless they come out with a Denalli with a blown 427 Vette motorCRAZY FROM THE HEAT WINDOW TINTING
2009 CYBER GREY CORVETTE ZR1
1993 RED FORD MUSTANG NOTCH
01-22-2012, 10:44 PM #64
01-22-2012, 11:05 PM #65
That was actually closer than I thought for a stock to stock comparison...
But hands down if they were both tuned the eco boost world rock its world in a race...
01-23-2012, 01:05 AM #66
What gears did each truck have? I'm surprised no one has brought that up. It is a huge factor in whether or not this race is a good comparison.
Vortech V2 S-trim, 3.12" pulley, A2A Treadstone, 4" Custom Power Pipe, Tial Q50, Borla CB, Flowtech LTs & OR X, XCAL3, 96 Cobra Cams, Ported intake, Built Rear (moser 31s, frpp tlok, moser studs, alum diff cov), 3.55s, Built AP 3650, Alum DS, Ram HDX Clutch, LDC Coolin Mod, Soild Motor Mounts, Poly Trans Mount, MGW short throw, MM CC plates, MM FLSFC, U&LCA, KYB Adj. Shocks, Strange Adj. Struts, HIDs, Innovate WB, Cobra body kit, Summit Fast 5s, '10 Running Horse, SEM Hot Rod Black paint, more mods, everything installed by me
1/4 PB with a 6,500ft DA: 12.20 @ 118, 1.6 60ft
01-23-2012, 03:50 AM #67
01-23-2012, 08:06 AM #68
- Join Date
- June 2009
01-23-2012, 09:43 AM #69
01-23-2012, 09:46 AM #70
the bullydog is said to "feel faster" but no time slips yet or dyno numbers.
the fastlane tune was proven to be complete
5.0 trucks with bolt-ons are already in the 13s and getting similar mileage to eco trucks.
Last edited by mc01svt; 01-23-2012 at 10:01 AM.
01-23-2012, 10:01 AM #71
01-23-2012, 10:20 AM #72
For the price of the Eco I would have expected a significant improvement in gas mileage. IMHO, another failed experiment of trying to get everyone to buy into this "green" technology which, again IMHO, is nothing more than a marketing ploy.
My 2011 Tundra with the 5.7L, 4wd, crewmax at 6320 lbs (with me in it) and a 3" leveling kit on the front averages 17.3 MPG with a near even mix of highway and surface streets. On long highway runs I'll touch 18 MPG regularly. Aside from leveling kit it's stock down to the filter.2013 STi - Stage II
2012 Ducati Panigale S - Stock (For now...)
2003 Cobra 459 RWHP 469 RWTQ <--Gone
2005 STi <-- Gone
01-23-2012, 10:24 AM #73
I would like the mpg's but ill keep the 6.2, the sound is awesome.
03 DSG Cobra - sold
01-23-2012, 10:42 AM #74
- Join Date
- July 2008
- Leesburg VA
01-23-2012, 10:53 AM #75