Results 1 to 25 of 43
Thread: Lucas synthetic oil stabilizer
05-22-2012, 06:30 AM #1
Lucas synthetic oil stabilizer
Thoughts on this product from the svtperformance community? it really seems to help older engines out. I've heard mixed reviews but the majority likes this product. On a scientific level people say it doesn't hurt the oil that it mixes with and that it doesn't cause aeration unlike the boboilguy gear model which suppose to act like the inside of engine...01 Silver Audi A4 - Daily
96 Mustang GT - Race Car
02 Mustang GT Vert - Cruiser
05-22-2012, 12:16 PM #2
Lucas Oil Stabilizer isn't the best option to use in an engine, and here is why.
It's a very viscous 60 grade base stock lubricant that has little to no additives. It does nothing more than thicken the oil you are mixing it with, while also diluting the additives. Why would you want to reduce the percentage of additives in the lubricant when replacing one quart of normal oil with LOS?
Do it correctly, simply buy a robust lubricant in a heavier 20W-50 grade. You will achieve similar viscosity grades, but you will not reduce the additive percentages.
OP, do you have a particular engine in question?
05-22-2012, 01:19 PM #3
05-22-2012, 01:34 PM #4
05-22-2012, 03:24 PM #5
05-22-2012, 03:52 PM #6
05-22-2012, 05:07 PM #7
05-24-2012, 09:35 PM #8
- Join Date
- July 2011
I remember a test performed by "Bob is the Oil Guy" showing that the Lucas oil stabilizer foams up pretty badly when used in high RPM applications.
Basically it compared regular motor oil with Lucas Oil Stabilizer, and the Lucas turned to foam when it was exposed to high RPM/windage. Obviously foam is not good and will cause the oil sump to suck air, resulting in a loss of oil pressure.
So while it may be fine for a tractor or low RPM diesel, its not reccommended for performance applications.04 Cobra - I/E/Pulley/Tune
05-25-2012, 03:54 PM #9
05-30-2012, 01:01 AM #10
i have to say in older engines like the 302-351 ect. Lucus was great when it had high miles or small leaks. best stuff ever in old stuff. but id agree in the newer engines with much tighter clearences an high rpm its not the best choice.
2008 Shelby GT500
2921 out of 6513 coupes
132 of 314 Alloy Metallic
Shelby Dash Plaque,FRPP TVS Super power pack ,Drag Pack,SVT handling pack,FRPP Cobra Jet TB/MAF/80lb injectors,J&M UCA,LCA,Adj.PHB,SFC,PH A/D,O/R H, DynoMax 3in,CHE, Shelby Rad/HE,VMP 2.59,KB BAP,L&M plenum,BMR KMEMEBER,AED CUSTOM RETURN STYLE FUEL SYSTEM.
91/E85 tune by SHAUN AT AED
700HP/700TQ ON E85
10.78 @ 129MPH 1.644 60FT
2014 Fiesta ST Green Envy Tricoat
2014 Tuxedo Black Fusion
05-30-2012, 07:56 PM #11
If you use Lucas and thinks it help you should just use a thicker oil to start with and save the money you'd spend on the additive.
05-30-2012, 11:47 PM #12
That stuff is a NO GO!99 SVT Cobra-Intercooled Vortech
FordSpeed Racing & Machine, Largo Fla.
Outlaw Pro-Mod build in progress!
06-01-2012, 07:50 PM #13
i liked it in my old FE 390 motor, it had around 225k miles on it and yes it needed more oil pressure due to age. it seemed to quite it down a little bit too. i change the mach1 and lightning oil at the same time so i splite a bottle of that stuff between the two. never really noticed anything from the useage though.2004 white mach1 391rwhp
2001 ford lightning 420 rwhp
2011 Mitsubishi evolution GSR 686 awhp RG, 550 awhp on 93
06-02-2012, 01:46 PM #14
The better alternative would have been a robust 20W-50 lubricant.
06-03-2012, 01:58 PM #15
Great responses! But I really believe for older engines it helps.
06-04-2012, 05:24 AM #16
I'll chime in, since I use the stuff.
The reason I use it is because Blackstone Labs actually recomended it to me. I figure if an independant lab that does oil testing recomended, it can't be all bad.
I was seeing some strange wear in my Terminator motor so I started running a quart of LOS in place of one of the 6 quarts of 5w20, that I normally would use, and my test results improved. I was open tracking the car at the time and would change my oil every other event, so my oil was getting changed about every 300 miles and seeing frequent testing. LOS actually has a viscosity of 45wt,not 60 as mentioned earlier. It is also a 70% sythetic base and 30% additives.
Also I believe that 5w20 is to light for a Terminator engine anyway and probably switching to 5w30 would give the same results. The 5w20 was probably used by Ford to squeeze out a little more fuel economy and HP numbers.
I also use a quart of LOS in my 7.3 diesel when I change that. Blackstone has recomended to me that I could extend my oil change intervals to 8K miles with the current oil and useage that I do. I just can't bring myself to wait that long so the 7.3 gets changed every 7K miles with petro based Motorcraft 15w40 and a quart of LOS. Currently it has 178K miles and still going strong.
I switched from my Terminator, to an old school '90GT for open track about 2 years ago. The motor has 97K miles on it and I am not as particular about whether it has to get replaced, since it probably will need it soon anyway and it is cheaper to build than a mod motor. I have been running diesel oil, 15w40 in that with 1/2 a quart of LOS. I have done no testing but, I will grab a sample this next oil change and report back what I find. I did change the heads over to iron GT40s recently, and when I pulled the original heads off you could still clearly see the cross hatch pattern on the cylinder walls. No unusual scoring of any kind.
I do think in most cases a switch to a next higher grade oil would be fine, but in cases like my diesel that is not an option. Also I am just looking for a little more robustness to the oil. In any event, so far it has worked great for me and I have been using it regularly for about 3 years.
Last edited by wheelhopper; 06-04-2012 at 05:27 AM.
06-04-2012, 08:20 AM #17
Last edited by UnleashedBeast; 06-04-2012 at 08:33 AM.
06-04-2012, 05:26 PM #181951 Ford F1 Rat Rod.Slow and loud.
2004 BMW M3 Vert CAI, TSW wheels. Exhaust and a single turbo soon to come.
1985 Mustang Coupe 6.0 T56
2007 GMC Sierra extend cab black on black stock 20's DD.
06-04-2012, 10:49 PM #19
06-05-2012, 06:57 AM #20
I think there might be a difference between synthetic version, and non-synthetic version. 45wt for synthetic, and 60wt for the other. And I'm purely guessing here.
06-05-2012, 12:31 PM #21
06-05-2012, 02:13 PM #2202 Lightning.....2.3 KB, bottle fed, cammed, built motor by Panhandle Performance
03 MG Cobra.....RIP 6/29/13
Whipple 2.9~Lethal Return~80's~FTBR~FRPP~RXT/Viper Spec T56.......tuned by Eric Brooks
11 Cadillac SRX Luxury Pkg.....dd
03 Lincoln LS V8.....dd
99 GT 35th anniversary vert.....traded
06-05-2012, 04:11 PM #23
06-05-2012, 08:45 PM #24
06-05-2012, 09:11 PM #25
Call any oil company in the world besides Lucas and ask what they think about using oil additives. They are going to tell you not to use oil additives.
Lucas oil stabilizer is basically a bottle/can of viscosity improver.(VI additive)
You can accomplish the same thing with better results by simply buying the next heavier grade of oil, except then your additive balance will be as designed by the oil company. Assuming your engine is worn out enough to benefit from a heavier oil.
Just run a better oil, it's been working for me.Jimmy
Still kicking! HOT ROD POWER TOUR LONG HAULER! 2014 AND 2013!
MYSTICHROME #539<-The AWESOMENESS is fade resistant.
2004 SVT Focus daily beater
Sr. Automotive Technical Support with *Royal Purple Synthetic Lubricants<-and LOVING it!
*The Performance Oil that Outperforms®*
If you love ADRENALIN LIKE I DO and haven't tried this yet....
YOU NEED TO!!!---->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03ALG6pN_R0
Mods page http://www.gotstang.com/webpages/Jim...-Mustang/mods/