• Welcome to SVTPerformance!

What cooling upgrades...

Discussion in '2013-14 Shelby GT500' started by rwleonard, Jan 9, 2018.

  1. Fabman302

    Fabman302 Current Project: FRANKENSTANG Established Member

    Messages:
    396
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Location:
    Pleasanton
    No heat problems here and I make pretty good power.
    Of course, it's just an old 3V.....

    19555007_10155463114173535_4940459107451612794_n.jpg
     
    PhoenixM3 likes this.
  2. Catmonkey

    Catmonkey I Void Warranties! Premium Member Established Member

    Messages:
    2,596
    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Location:
    Louisiana
  3. Thabeast

    Thabeast Active Member Premium Member Established Member

    Messages:
    176
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Location:
    Henderson KY
    I’d be one of the first to plunk down the ole fantastic plastic for one if it ever comes to fruition
     
  4. Norton

    Norton Long-time SVT Enthusiast Established Member

    Messages:
    1,951
    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2012
    Location:
    Colorado Springs, CO
    I'm also running billet tanks (from Van), and agree with Ohio Snake, that they're primarily cosmetic. In my experience, the Intercooler tank was marginally larger than OEM (by about a pint), and the main coolant tank was about the same capacity as OEM.
     
    rwleonard likes this.
  5. rwleonard

    rwleonard Active Member Established Member

    Messages:
    118
    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    I went to the DOB facebook page and asked if the GT500 cooling upgrades were going to make it to market. The reply was, "Soon."
     
  6. tomshep

    tomshep Another R Addict Established Member

    Messages:
    3,702
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2003
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    I've run my 14 in OT sessions in Texas in March. These were 20 minute sessions. Temps were in the lower 80s. I am basically stock on the motor, blower, pulley, etc. Never had a problem with pulling power I could determine. I did have the clutch get soft one session in the early afternoon. Otherwise, ran great.

    Also, I do NOT have track pack coolers.

    Tom
     
    48yrs and kwarnerjr like this.
  7. 2112

    2112 Member Established Member

    Messages:
    390
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2008
    Location:
    Washington
    To be clear, is the C&R radiator an upgraded unit for the '13-'14 model years?
     
  8. rwleonard

    rwleonard Active Member Established Member

    Messages:
    118
    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
  9. 2112

    2112 Member Established Member

    Messages:
    390
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2008
    Location:
    Washington
    Yeah, I have seen that and my take was that the application was correct but I am still unsure if it has better cooling capacity than the OEM unit.
     
  10. PhoenixM3

    PhoenixM3 Hello Kitty Slayer Established Member

    Messages:
    1,441
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2012
    Location:
    Colorado Springs
    Do you track your car? I’m more interested in HPDE than the strip.
     
  11. Jam421

    Jam421 Jam421 Established Member

    Messages:
    219
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Location:
    Long Island NY
    Would a larger inter cooler coolant reservoir help OP to assist keeping blower temps down at not that much of an expense ?
     
  12. Robert M

    Robert M 800 HORSE FUN!! Established Member

    Messages:
    8,038
    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Location:
    Sunny, Fla.
    The 2013/14 radiator fan shroud assy. is also a nice plug-n-play upgrade to the 2007-2012, it provides a larger diameter fan and trap doors in the lower shroud area, both of which allow for better air flow through the H/E and radiator itself.......But even the Ford cooling system upgrades that are assy. line production on the 2013/14 GT500 are for cars at a 662hp level, once a car gets into the 725, 750+hp levels and even larger blowers 2.8, 2.9, 3.4, 3.6, I would guess that the oem 2013/14 cooling upgrades would also need to be examined, as Ford/SVT did from 2012 550 to 2013 662?

    It would seem that the air flow through a 2007-2012 I/C would be restricted on a 725/750+ blower car if Ford felt that the I/C air flow needed to be upsized at the 662 TVS level from the previous 550 and even smaller Eaton?

    How would I/C air flow restriction below the S/C relate to hp loss and/or heat gain?


    R
     
    Last edited: Jan 19, 2018
    Coz likes this.
  13. Catmonkey

    Catmonkey I Void Warranties! Premium Member Established Member

    Messages:
    2,596
    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Location:
    Louisiana
    I have the C&R in my car and it's got a much thicker core and larger tanks than my OEM radiator. You have to cut the radiator hoses down to install it. When I look at my data logs, it recovers pretty quickly. I never logged it with the old radiator, so I can't compare. I've not been on a road course with it either.
     
    rwleonard likes this.
  14. lexustech48

    lexustech48 I like Fords n stuff Premium Member Established Member

    Messages:
    3,060
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2014
    Location:
    Arizona
    In the Trinity cars a larger IC reservoir wont help with temps. As your hoses are concerned, on the 13-14 Ford had to make a bypass style upper hose due to the massive increase in flow of the trinity IC pump. The main flow of coolant bypasses entering the IC tank.

    Installing a Trinity IC pump on my 2011 forced me to make the custom hose right then and there. I was getting aeration of my IC fluid without it as the high flow of the pump slammed the fluid back into the reservoir tank.

    By going to the bypass style hose, the IC tank now merely acts as a fill/air purge point and expansion point of the fluid as there is hardly any flow through it. In my write up for 07-12 owners wanting to upgrade to the 13-14 IC pump, I recommended they stick with the stock IC tank to make the dimensions of the hose section easier to cut and assemble.

    Any advantage that a larger reservoir of cooler fluid has in the old 07-12 pump styles doesn't hold true for Trinity cars/.
     

Share This Page