MY 03 pullied cobra vs stock 2011 Challenger SRT8 392 Hemi

MACHXLR8

Third Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
1,383
Location
North Carolina
this 392 with a big cam heads and intake with full exhaust will be a monster. i love my cobra, and i love the 500's and i love the 5.0, but im tired of FI all the time to see big gains. this car will be making great power and huge torque na when built.

I hate to tell ya man but I think the DOHC FI Forged motor was way ahead of its time and is a good inidcator of what is to come. Smaller displacement, overhead cam motors with variable timing and Forced Induction. The push rod motor, while nice, makes great power and is proven technology, will become obsoleted in the near future for production cars. Maybe in race application, will the pushrod V8 still be used but I see the market going in the other direction for production vehicles. Just my opinion though..
Just look at the Cobra and the power that can be made from a small 281ci motor. Why use a huge displacement motor when you can compensate it with a supercharger or turbo?
 
Last edited:

92hatchlx

Colorado Rocky Mountain High
Established Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
1,669
Location
Strasburg, CO
"The Challenger is my former Chief's new car. He used to have a 2007 Shelby GT500 and a 2010 Challenger R/T He traded them both in for a 2011 Green Challenger SRT8 392 Hemi. This car is beautiful. It's got the Green Metallic looking paint with black racing stripes."

LEO or Navy?
 

holzmach

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Messages
153
Location
terre haute in
I hate to tell ya man but I think the DOHC FI Forged motor was way ahead of its time and is a good inidcator of what is to come. Smaller displacement, overhead cam motors with variable timing and Forced Induction. The push rod motor, while nice, makes great power and is proven technology, will become obsoleted in the near future for production cars. Maybe in race application, will the pushrod V8 still be used but I see the market going in the other direction for production vehicles. Just my opinion though..
Just look at the Cobra and the power that can be made from a small 281ci motor. Why use a huge displacement motor when you can compensate it with a supercharger or turbo?

thats my point.

cause it is cool and the roots. 500 rwhp with fi, to me, will never be as cool as 500 na power. the sound of high compression,big cam, headers =:rockon: all day. when i go to the spot on the weekends and i start up my car, then someone starts up there a na combo i cant even hear my car.ya i still have to put cars lengths on them to keep them in check,:-D but still they sound better at idle.
 
Last edited:

ITRIEDEL

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
1,447
Location
South Tejas
Yeah, Because we all know the Challenger was developed using space age technology. They really need to get rid of those old outdated DOHC Forced induction motors with forged internals. They keep making these mistakes. The GT500 is another example of an outdated car that is still in production today. :lol:

:lol:..... no maybe the exterior that looks like the other 90% of the mustangs on the road and the interior that reminds you your not in 2011 and instead contemplating whether your in a 94 or 04 ... MINUS WHITE FACE GUAGES... OOO-WEEE
 

Beetle6986

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 29, 2004
Messages
616
Location
PA
:lol:..... no maybe the exterior that looks like the other 90% of the mustangs on the road and the interior that reminds you your not in 2011 and instead contemplating whether your in a 94 or 04 ... MINUS WHITE FACE GUAGES... OOO-WEEE

Yeah, because 90% of the mustangs on the road look like 03/04 Cobras. :bash: Interior, are you kidding me? We are talking about a muscle car. They are loud, they vibrate and they go fast. If I want a smooth ride, I'll get into my 535 or Acadia. BTW, the Challenger interior is made of the same plastic used in the mustang. Try again....
 
Last edited:

ITRIEDEL

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
1,447
Location
South Tejas
Yeah, because 90% of the mustangs on the road look like 03/04 Cobras. :bash: Interior, are you kidding me? We are talking about a muscle car. They are loud, they vibrate and they go fast. If I want a smooth ride, I'll get into my 535 or Acadia. BTW, the Challenger interior is made of the same plastic used in the mustang. Try again....

SN-95 NEWEDGE... goes for v6 goes for cobras...

Wutever, its like arguing religon with some of you cobra owners... your right im wrong, the cobra is almighty its the best and if I dont believe that its because im blind...

all i gotta say is :lol:
 

S8ER01Z

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2006
Messages
4,897
Location
Quad Cities
"The Challenger is my former Chief's new car. He used to have a 2007 Shelby GT500 and a 2010 Challenger R/T He traded them both in for a 2011 Green Challenger SRT8 392 Hemi. This car is beautiful. It's got the Green Metallic looking paint with black racing stripes."

LEO or Navy?


Or Fire? :beer::rockon:
 

RideThePONY

Say what?
Established Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2011
Messages
314
Location
Delaware
thats my point.

cause it is cool and the roots. 500 rwhp with fi, to me, will never be as cool as 500 na power. the sound of high compression,big cam, headers =:rockon: all day. when i go to the spot on the weekends and i start up my car, then someone starts up there a na combo i cant even hear my car.ya i still have to put cars lengths on them to keep them in check,:-D but still they sound better at idle.

True. Last cruising weekend in OC as soon I got there pulled up next too a Chevelle with cutouts, cam and whatever else he was trying to yell at me over his idle. That was easily the nastiest loudest street car ive ever heard. He still got pulled to the next light but damn if she didn't sound great. :burnout:
 

Stopsign32v

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2002
Messages
9,444
I've stated on LS1tech I think fully that my lightly bolt on Mach 1 could take a stock 392 from a dig. The Mopar nut swingers said I was full of :bs:
 

S8ER01Z

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2006
Messages
4,897
Location
Quad Cities
I've stated on LS1tech I think fully that my lightly bolt on Mach 1 could take a stock 392 from a dig. The Mopar nut swingers said I was full of :bs:

This should help you then... belongs to a friend's dad (I've driven it myself and managed to run almost identical times to my own car).

Challenger392M6.png
 

Stopsign32v

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2002
Messages
9,444
Actually I am running the Mach with bolt ons and gears for the first time this coming friday. The Mopar nut swingers were saying the 392 is a 12.3-12.4 car stock.
 

MACHXLR8

Third Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
1,383
Location
North Carolina
thats my point.

cause it is cool and the roots. 500 rwhp with fi, to me, will never be as cool as 500 na power. the sound of high compression,big cam, headers =:rockon: all day. when i go to the spot on the weekends and i start up my car, then someone starts up there a na combo i cant even hear my car.ya i still have to put cars lengths on them to keep them in check,:-D but still they sound better at idle.

Yes.. I have to agree with you 100%...There is nothing like an old big block with big cubic inches and a cam. However, whatever gets you to the finish line first is what really counts especially if your running for cash. :beer:
 

MACHXLR8

Third Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
1,383
Location
North Carolina
Actually I am running the Mach with bolt ons and gears for the first time this coming friday. The Mopar nut swingers were saying the 392 is a 12.3-12.4 car stock.

I did see that Youtube video of the 392 running a 12.4 :dw: however, I think that was a rare occurence where a great driver ran their 392 on a perfectly prepped track with a great DA. I have yet to see this time duplicated in stock form since.
 

Stopsign32v

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2002
Messages
9,444
I wasnt going to say anything but this statement is dumb as hell. A bolt on mach 1 will get destroyed by a 392. I cant tell you how many bolt on mach 1's I have beat from a dig and roll. I even made a callout on SVTP to run a mach 1 with similar mods as me and all I got was excuses that irwindales 1/8th mile is to short. And you do realize that since there are now 10+ guys on the 392 fastest stock list that are running 12.2-12.4's @113-114 it makes it a low 12 second car right?

Here is the major nut swinger himself LOL
 

S8ER01Z

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2006
Messages
4,897
Location
Quad Cities
I did see that Youtube video of the 392 running a 12.4 :dw: however, I think that was a rare occurence where a great driver ran their 392 on a perfectly prepped track with a great DA. I have yet to see this time duplicated in stock form since.

My understanding is that 12.4 run had drag radials. The time slip I posted was done in -400da. Not the best 60ft or anything but I don't see a 12.4 happening in stock form.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top