Some of you are getting a bit out of hand here. If you've never driven the IRS to its limit, your opinion doesn't matter...at all. How much do you actually know about engineering a suspension? How many of you actually were a part of the design process, in the meetings, on CAD machines, running calculations, etc. for the suspension on ANY vehicle? Get a grip.
The blind gospel of the SRA continues, but I'm not surprised by how many jump on the band wagon. Compare the number of SRA Mustangs to IRS Mustangs from the factory and you see the reasoning behind the huge aftermarket and overall complacency with upgrading the SRA. I, for one, have driven both and love the communication I get from this supposedly crappy IRS. If you are willing to open your eyes, read this (post #64) and tell me how poor the IRS performs in comparison to a fully built SRA on a real track.
Hey, this is an easy one. The SRA is simple and easy to understand. You don't have to think about anything. Just slap it in and go. I believe this is why the Romans put them on their chariots. What the hell did they know, or for that matter care, about handling and ride back then.
It's amazing to me, with modern day technology, how many people have this antiquated mindset.:dw: