Rear suspension upgrades

Which manufacture for rear suspension upgrade?

  • BMR

    Votes: 7 87.5%
  • UPR

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • other

    Votes: 1 12.5%

  • Total voters
    8

samshady

Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Messages
113
Location
richmond,va
Guys after my pulley swap I've definitely seen the need for more traction in the rear. I'm looking at non adjustable upper control arms, single adjustable lower control arms, adjustable panhard bar, and lca drop brackets. I started looking at BMR products and wanted to know if their was a consensus on which company is best for suspenstion parts?


Edit. This is a 98% daily driven street car. I may take it to the drag strip or road course once just to say I did it. Running street tires and will never have a slick and more than likely never have a drag radial.
Thanks
 
Last edited:

RBB

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Messages
1,354
Location
Stephens City, VA
I don't think you can go wrong either way. That said, I run BMR everything and they are running a nice 15% off Black Friday sale on all their parts.
 

1st usa car

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
526
Location
JAX Florida
As long as its a name brand -- you should be fine. BMR just seems like the better bargain. Also, they are on sale. IF i were to do it over -- I would get a Watts system
 

Robert M

800 HORSE FUN!!
Established Member
Joined
May 15, 2003
Messages
9,157
Location
Sunny, Fla.
Guys after my pulley swap I've definitely seen the need for more traction in the rear. I'm looking at non adjustable upper control arms, single adjustable lower control arms, adjustable panhard bar, and lca drop brackets. I started looking at BMR products and wanted to know if their was a consensus on which company is best for suspenstion parts?

Thanks

For the UCA choice, are you 2007-2010 or 2011-2014?

I have had the longer/more robust 2011-2014 in my 2008 for about 4 years with no issues.

Ford lengthened the Upper Control Arm for better axle swing geometry and also upsized the bushing and attaching hardware. <<<These same upgrades are found in the BMR UCA.

The two adj. BMR's shown side-by-side below.........

025-zps61c8f4e3.jpg


These also come in non-adjustable.




R
 

Catmonkey

I Void Warranties!
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
3,854
Location
Louisiana
There are no magic bullets when it comes to harnessing too much power. However, many of the components from the aftermarket will make the car feel a bit more controlled. I think you're far ahead of the game if you don't mix and match manufacturer's parts.
 

samshady

Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Messages
113
Location
richmond,va
For the UCA choice, are you 2007-2010 or 2011-2014?

I have had the longer/more robust 2011-2014 in my 2008 for about 4 years with no issues.

Ford lengthened the Upper Control Arm for better axle swing geometry and also upsized the bushing and attaching hardware. <<<These same upgrades are found in the BMR UCA.

The two adj. BMR's shown side-by-side below.........

View attachment 1530457

These also come in non-adjustable.




R
I've got a 2012 and plan on doing non adjustable uppers and adjustable lowers.

Sent from my SM-G955U using the svtperformance.com mobile app
 

samshady

Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Messages
113
Location
richmond,va
There are no magic bullets when it comes to harnessing too much power. However, many of the components from the aftermarket will make the car feel a bit more controlled. I think you're far ahead of the game if you don't mix and match manufacturer's parts.
Car had non adjustable Steeda lowers when I bought it. After talking to the shop doing the work they recommend doing adjustable lowers and non adjustable uppers rather than adding adjustable uppers now. I do want all that shiny hammer tone black underneath too.

Sent from my SM-G955U using the svtperformance.com mobile app
 

Black Cobra '99

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
720
Location
East
If you're going to lower the car then its a good idea to have adjustable upper to correct pinion angel. Also, LCA relo bracket is for lowered cars, if you're not lowered now don't install them.

I don't see why you'd need adjustable LCA, I think its better to stay with what you have.
 

Robert M

800 HORSE FUN!!
Established Member
Joined
May 15, 2003
Messages
9,157
Location
Sunny, Fla.
I've got a 2012 and plan on doing non adjustable uppers and adjustable lowers.

Sent from my SM-G955U using the svtperformance.com mobile app

The upper is one arm so it will not be "uppers". The primary reason for the adjustable upper is for pinion angle adjustment, if you are going to leave your car at the stock/oem Ford ride height in the rear, there is no reason to adjust. If you are going to lower the car, that is when adjustable can come into the equation. <<And at that point, a panhard bar will also be needed to center the axle under the car once the body is lowered.

R
 

1Kona_Venom

US Army (Ret)
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
4,977
Location
Savannah, Ga
^ to Robert M's post. I had a stock everything 2011. I only changed my factory wheels and put the Alcoas on and plain as day, the rear axle was not centered. one wheel was wayyyyyy sticking out.

OP, don't mix and match companies. If you plan on making more than stock power, than maybe soon a 1 piece drivehaft will be an idea? I say that will allow for pinion angle adjustment.

FWIW, I went with Team Z Adj Upper and lowers, Adj Panhard and no relocation brackets. Eibach Pro Springs, 1 Pc D/S. I would rather have the adjustability and not need it, than to need it and not have it. My alignment guy was appreciative too.

I'm a street car
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top