03 mach vs 2010 challenger SRT8

neatofrito1618

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
1,646
Location
TX
Whatever the outcome of the race, at the end of the day you're driving a Ford while he's still stuck driving a GM.

You come out on top either way.
 

CD07GT500

Klaus's Bitch
Established Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2010
Messages
2,564
Location
MS
Just to stir the pot

392: Stock
LS1: Bolt Ons / Cam
Lumina: Tune - Deleted Cats

Didnt know bolt on Mach's are faster then Cam / Bolt on LS1's :D

Run 1
Challenger 392 Vs Lumina Vs Pontiac Trans Am (Part 1) - YouTube

Run 2
Challenger 392 Vs Lumina Vs Pontiac Trans Am ( Part 2 ) - YouTube

Cool story in fact My car when it was a mild bolt-on car ran next to a ms3 cam camaro from a roll but that does not show comparable performance. The track does :poke: So again what does or bolt-on 6.1 run?
 

SRT8tech

2013 Super Bee
Established Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
474
Location
Jacksonville FL.
C6 ZO6 vs. drag radial and 3000 stall converter 392 Challenger. I figured Id throw this in there. He has gone an 11.8 since this vid too.

[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnrAfQxkjXQ"]11 second 2011 SRT8 392 Dodge Challenger - YouTube[/nomedia]
 
Last edited:

SRT8tech

2013 Super Bee
Established Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
474
Location
Jacksonville FL.
I guess I will post this very small fast list of the 392's also.

01: cosmer [email protected] 1.750 60' 392 A5 nitrous
02: brian@snl [email protected] 1.707 60' 392 A5 CAI. Catback, Converter, drag radials
03: SRT8Tech [email protected] 1.907 60' 392 A5 stock
04: Dad's Toy [email protected] 1.845 60' 392 A5 strut tower braces, sub frame connectors
05: indybill [email protected] 1.825 60' 392 A5 K&N, Cat Back
06: driven by [email protected] 1.884 60' 392 M6 Drag Radials
07: 04bluesrt4 [email protected] 1.967 60' 392 A5 K&N, Cat Back
08: KyHemiRT [email protected] 1.939 60' 392 A5 stock
09: Flying Dutchman [email protected] 2.033 60' A5 stock
10: bskylerj [email protected] 1.904 60' 392 A5 stock
11: DonP [email protected] 1.912 60' 392 A5 stock
12: Red Barron [email protected] 2.021 60' M6 Stock
13: hemi420 [email protected] 1.933 60' 392 M6 stock
14: Viper [email protected] 2.033 60' 392 M6 K&N
15: MrBohica [email protected] 2.1011 60' 392 stock
16: CrankCase [email protected] 2.007 60' M6 stock
17: SparkChicken [email protected] 2.080 60' 392 A5 stock
18: nevertoofast [email protected] 2.1492 60' 392 A5 K&N
19: GodsRodsHEMI [email protected] 2.059 60' 392 A5 stock
20: 555ss [email protected] 2.004 60' 392 M6 stock
21: Mayra [email protected] 2.161 60' 392 A5 stock
22: Litos [email protected] 2.119 60' 392 A5 stock
 

CD07GT500

Klaus's Bitch
Established Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2010
Messages
2,564
Location
MS
I guess I will post this very small fast list of the 392's also.

01: cosmer [email protected] 1.750 60' 392 A5 nitrous
02: brian@snl [email protected] 1.707 60' 392 A5 CAI. Catback, Converter, drag radials
03: SRT8Tech [email protected] 1.907 60' 392 A5 stock
04: Dad's Toy [email protected] 1.845 60' 392 A5 strut tower braces, sub frame connectors
05: indybill [email protected] 1.825 60' 392 A5 K&N, Cat Back
06: driven by [email protected] 1.884 60' 392 M6 Drag Radials
07: 04bluesrt4 [email protected] 1.967 60' 392 A5 K&N, Cat Back
08: KyHemiRT [email protected] 1.939 60' 392 A5 stock
09: Flying Dutchman [email protected] 2.033 60' A5 stock
10: bskylerj [email protected] 1.904 60' 392 A5 stock
11: DonP [email protected] 1.912 60' 392 A5 stock
12: Red Barron [email protected] 2.021 60' M6 Stock
13: hemi420 [email protected] 1.933 60' 392 M6 stock
14: Viper [email protected] 2.033 60' 392 M6 K&N
15: MrBohica [email protected] 2.1011 60' 392 stock
16: CrankCase [email protected] 2.007 60' M6 stock
17: SparkChicken [email protected] 2.080 60' 392 A5 stock
18: nevertoofast [email protected] 2.1492 60' 392 A5 K&N
19: GodsRodsHEMI [email protected] 2.059 60' 392 A5 stock
20: 555ss [email protected] 2.004 60' 392 M6 stock
21: Mayra [email protected] 2.161 60' 392 A5 stock
22: Litos [email protected] 2.119 60' 392 A5 stock

So let me get this straight the 392 auto with similar mods as me when I went 12.4 @ 113.2 corrected went 11.96 @ 114. ( got me on the 60ft by .15)

I hope they get a little faster with a tune :thumbsup:. Impressive cars regardless
 

SRT8tech

2013 Super Bee
Established Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
474
Location
Jacksonville FL.
So let me get this straight the 392 auto with similar mods as me when I went 12.4 @ 113.2 corrected went 11.96 @ 114. ( got me on the 60ft by .15)

I hope they get a little faster with a tune :thumbsup:. Impressive cars regardless

Well the problem with adding a CAI and catback on the 392's is you dont gain anything. So the truth is, believe it or not, a CAI catback 392 wont run any better than a stock one. Hell my (corrected) times are in the 11's bone stock. Corrected times are pretty much a waste. I dont even know why people bring them up.
 

Deuuuce

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
1,210
Location
San Jose, CA
You damn right!!!!!!! :rockon:

Cuz Ford 4-doors are sooo fast. The "Laguna Seca" version Viper lapped 1:33......lol

Who cares?

Is this humor or your just a nutswinger?

It also ran that with those mods, picked up nothing at all with those from stock. :shrug: Weather/track conditions maybe?

I think it's been answered. Animalwarfest slowsho all the way.

Well the problem with adding a CAI and catback on the 392's is you dont gain anything. So the truth is, believe it or not, a CAI catback 392 wont run any better than a stock one. Hell my (corrected) times are in the 11's bone stock. Corrected times are pretty much a waste. I dont even know why people bring them up.

IS-Fs don't gain anything from a CAI either, just headers basically. Any header 392s doing better?
 

Stopsign32v

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2002
Messages
9,444
Cuz Ford 4-doors are sooo fast. The "Laguna Seca" version Viper lapped 1:33......lol



Is this humor or your just a nutswinger?



I think it's been answered. Animalwarfest slowsho all the way.







Vehicle: Charger SRT-8 HP: 413 TQ: 432 1/4 Mile: 12.72@ 111.06

demotivational-posters-well-theres-your-problem6.jpg
 

da5deuce

heatsoaked
Established Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2010
Messages
8,722
Location
compton
I can't help Dodges are slow :shrug:

And LT1s.... ;-)

Well put me in that category since onebadws6 took the win on basically every run we did.

No worries though it was a fun run and I will be back stronger next time:cool:

Sent from compton while avoiding prostitutes, drive by's, and jehovahs witness' while using a android phone
 

Monster Mach

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2010
Messages
3,002
Location
india
Maybe splitting hairs but the same mods puts SRT-8 autos at 113-114mph at MIR. That's why from a roll on any given day, a Mach driven on the street would be fun, but likely pulled by an SRT-8 (from a roll).

Base price vs base price ;) for the extra 20 grand spent to pick up a challenger stock (vs stock prices) the mach would be more classy and have 800hp if done right

Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk
 

1slow4v

New Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
122
Location
Michigan
Base price vs base price ;) for the extra 20 grand spent to pick up a challenger stock (vs stock prices) the mach would be more classy and have 800hp if done right

Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk

I don't see how you're going to make a Mach more more classy than a fully loaded SRT-8 with in dash nav, power and heated seats, and all the other creature comforts you could want...

A faster car yes, just after a few thousand dollars...
 

five0three

big deal
Established Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2011
Messages
829
Location
Minot ND
Base price vs base price ;) for the extra 20 grand spent to pick up a challenger stock (vs stock prices) the mach would be more classy and have 800hp if done right

Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk

this argument is almost always irrelevant. i get this all the time because i decided to buy a new mustang instead of a 'project'. sure instead of buying a 30k+ car, i could have bought a notch shell and been in the 9's. Some people like to have their cake and eat it too...
 

2KBlackGT

The Man, Myth, The Legend
Established Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Messages
9,636
Location
Arkansas
Base price vs base price ;) for the extra 20 grand spent to pick up a challenger stock (vs stock prices) the mach would be more classy and have 800hp if done right

Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk

Don't be that guy.....
 

Monster Mach

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2010
Messages
3,002
Location
india
This. :lol:

A fox body usually kills this debate entirely. You just can't gain the things that an SRT8 delivers by taking a shit bucket and modding it. Ask me how I know. :rolling:

So I can't add heated seats and in dash nav for 1300? I like my interior better so nothing I would really improve on besides that. Hell I could make the entire dash flow better for 200 bucks.. and still be quicker and still be lighter

Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk
 

2KBlackGT

The Man, Myth, The Legend
Established Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Messages
9,636
Location
Arkansas
So I can't add heated seats and in dash nav for 1300? I like my interior better so nothing I would really improve on besides that. Hell I could make the entire dash flow better for 200 bucks.. and still be quicker and still be lighter

Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk

Dude, it's a dumb argument all around.........Let me put it in terms you can understand.

You sell your Mach for 12-14k and I sell my SRT8 for 21-24k. We both go buy Fox bodys and mod them, who will come out on top? My point is once the car is bought you can't say well I'll just and the price difference to my car and be better than the more expensive car. Hell if you add 10k in mods to your Mach I'll just add 10k in mods to the SRT8 and we'll still be right where we were lol.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top