6.2 Numbers Released

[BlownBolt]

411 hp and 434

Ford F-150 SVT Raptor 6.2-liter V-8 Power Ratings Announced - PickupTrucks.com Special Reports


Along with a new extreme Raptor

First Look: Ford FR Raptor XT Pre-Runner at SEMA - PickupTrucks.com Special Reports

 

[5point0guy]

Nice, I bet the Raptor will be a very fun truck with that engine in it.

 

[REX-RACER]

The most interesting speculation is here:

The new 6.2-liter V-8, formerly known as the Boss engine -- and the Hurricane before that -- will find its way under the hood of the 2011 Ford F-Series Super Duty F-250 and F-350 pickups, and is likely to also find its way into other F-150 models beyond the Raptor's off-road niche.

- That's the news I've been waiting to hear!!!

. . . also could the picture of the "6.2L" emblem foreshadow a new Lightning?!?! :-D

 

[dbmach12004]

Ill have to swap that into my 06 when I find the first wrecked one

 

[Z28]

Good numbers, but they don't seem that impressive considering the new 5.0 is suppose to have around 400 hp 400 tq. Half ton trucks have had a 400+ horse engines for quite a while now, and the new sierras have the new 6.2 with low 400's and Dodge upped the 5.7 Hemi to 390 horse. Just kinda seems like a big hype for an average engine.

That will be more than enough power for what that truck was built for though.

 

[Impetuous]

Good numbers, but they don't seem that impressive considering the new 5.0 is suppose to have around 400 hp 400 tq. Half ton trucks have had a 400+ horse engines for quite a while now, and the new sierras have the new 6.2 with low 400's and Dodge upped the 5.7 Hemi to 390 horse. Just kinda seems like a big hype for an average engine.

That will be more than enough power for what that truck was built for though.

I agree with you on that one. If I was to pick between the 5.0 and the 6.2 for the mustang I'll pick the latest. The potential of the 6.2l on n/a form most likely will not be touched with the 5.0. I am an all motor fan and sick of the lack of power of the modular engines on n/a form. Common...with a V8 you shouldn't need forced induction to be competitive do you? Shit there are V6's making more power than the modulars:shrug:that to me is a :nono:

 

[ON D BIT]

Good numbers, but they don't seem that impressive considering the new 5.0 is suppose to have around 400 hp 400 tq. Half ton trucks have had a 400+ horse engines for quite a while now, and the new sierras have the new 6.2 with low 400's and Dodge upped the 5.7 Hemi to 390 horse. Just kinda seems like a big hype for an average engine.

That will be more than enough power for what that truck was built for though.

why does it need to be more? i mean this is its first installment, and it does meat the more restrictive epa ratings coming out. add to that it will be a modders dream. first i heard 7.5 at 750 crank hp n/a, now i hearing 8.0 out of the same 6.2 block!!!!epper:

 

[lucheski]

Good numbers, but they don't seem that impressive considering the new 5.0 is suppose to have around 400 hp 400 tq. Half ton trucks have had a 400+ horse engines for quite a while now, and the new sierras have the new 6.2 with low 400's and Dodge upped the 5.7 Hemi to 390 horse. Just kinda seems like a big hype for an average engine.

That will be more than enough power for what that truck was built for though.

Gm and chrysler dont seem that impressive considering they are failed companies propped up with gov dollars. With the first being totally owned by the tax payer:lol: oke:

 

[supercarkiller]

^well said and so true !

 

[mc01svt]

Kinda dissappointed honestly. :shrug: These just seem like average numbers, I was hoping for at least 420/460. :sleeping:

 

[TrueBlue'01GT]

Gm and chrysler dont seem that impressive considering they are failed companies propped up with gov dollars. With the first being totally owned by the tax payer:lol: oke:

Still thier larger displacement V8's have more power.

 

[CobraBob]

Gm and chrysler dont seem that impressive considering they are failed companies propped up with gov dollars. With the first being totally owned by the tax payer:lol: oke:

What does the success of the company or being owned by the government/tax payers have to do with a particular motor produced by that company being better than what the competition offers. Chrysler or GM could be losing money like there was no tomorrow, and be in danger of going belly up, and still have the best truck or car motor available. So then that motor wouldn't be impressive in its own right? :shrug:

 

[Impetuous]

What does the success of the company or being owned by the government/tax payers have to do with a particular motor produced by that company being better than what the competition offers. Chrysler or GM could be losing money like there was no tomorrow, and be in danger of going belly up, and still have the best truck or car motor available. So then that motor wouldn't be impressive in its own right? :shrug:

Well said! :beer:

 

[Posi]

Put a nice tune in it and it'll make what you guys are wanting.

I love everything about the truck. Sure it could have more power but it's got plenty to work with or build on.

 

[capnkirk52]

Do you think FRPP will have a performance pack for this motor that can be dealer installed and not void the warranty? I have a 6.2 on order but it won't even be made for a long time.

 

[GTSpartan]

why does it need to be more? i mean this is its first installment, and it does meat the more restrictive epa ratings coming out. add to that it will be a modders dream. first i heard 7.5 at 750 crank hp n/a, now i hearing 8.0 out of the same 6.2 block!!!!epper:

No way you'll ever see close to 750 hp without major modifications. This engine has cast pistons and crank, so good luck with that. You make it sound like a simple increase in displacement will net you +350hp.

It's nice to see a nice big engine with good power, but it's not that impressive.

 

[CobrarboC]

that truck is so gawd damn ugly i cant believe any of you would even consider it.

 

[lucheski]

What does the success of the company or being owned by the government/tax payers have to do with a particular motor produced by that company being better than what the competition offers. Chrysler or GM could be losing money like there was no tomorrow, and be in danger of going belly up, and still have the best truck or car motor available. So then that motor wouldn't be impressive in its own right? :shrug:

Well written argument. I was just messing with the guy in good fun. I respect certain Chrysler and GM products just like every car guy should. However, if GM's products are so much better then why hasn't their stuff selling for so many years? Im sorry but I'll pay my greater respects to Ford...isn't this a Ford site?

 

[03 DSG Snake]

How many years will the Raptors be made?

Hoping to get my hands on a new one in a year or so. :burnout:

 

[svtsmo]

nice, but does ford have a thing against neat and clean looking engine bays?