Chicago approves new handgun restrictions!

bluestang41505

Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
398
Location
Deltona, Fl
And here i thought the ban was going away....:burn:

CHICAGO — The Chicago City Council on Friday approved what city officials say is the strictest handgun ordinance in the United States.
The 45-0 vote came four days after a Supreme Court ruling made it almost certain that Chicago's handgun ban would be overturned. The high court ruled Americans have a right to own a gun for self-defense anywhere they live.
The new city ordinance bans gun shops in Chicago and prohibits gun owners from stepping outside their homes, even onto their porches or garages, with a handgun. It will take effect in 10 days.
The ordinance also:
— Limits the number of handguns residents can register to one per month and prohibit residents from having more than one handgun in operating order at any given time.

— Requires residents in homes with children to keep them in lock boxes or equipped with trigger locks.

— Requires prospective gun owners to take a four-hour class and one-hour training at a gun range. They would have to leave the city for training because Chicago prohibits new gun ranges and limits the use of existing ranges to police officers. Those restrictions were similar to those in an ordinance passed in Washington, D.C., after the high court struck down its ban two years ago.

— Prohibits people from owning a gun if they were convicted of a violent crime, domestic violence or two or more convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Residents convicted of a gun offense would have to register with the police department.

— Calls for the police department to maintain a registry of every handgun owner in the city, with the names and addresses to be made available to police officers, firefighters and other emergency responders.

Those who already have handguns in the city — which has been illegal since the city's ban was approved 28 years ago — would have 90 days to register those weapons, according to the proposed ordinance.

Residents convicted of violating the city's ordinance can face a fine up to $5,000 and be locked up for as long as 90 days for a first offense and a fine of up to $10,000 and as long as six months behind bars for subsequent convictions.

Though Monday's Supreme Court ruling did not specifically strike down Chicago's handgun ban, it ordered a federal appeals court to reconsider its ruling.

Mayor Richard Daley moved quickly to get a new ordinance in place and has indicated that he expects legal challenges to the new restrictions.
Meanwhile, a northwestern Wisconsin prosecutor said he won't prosecute a range of state weapon violations in light of the Supreme Court ruling.

Jackson County District Attorney Gerald R. Fox said in a statement he will no longer prosecute people for carrying uncased or loaded guns in vehicles, carrying concealed weapons, carrying firearms in public buildings or taverns or carrying switchblades and butterfly knives.

Fox said the Supreme Court ruling invalidated Wisconsin's laws against those practices.

Peter Hamm, a spokesman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, said Fox is inviting crime into Jackson County and if he won't enforce the state's laws he should be removed from office.
 

lobra97

PIITB since 1984
Established Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
10,874
Location
210
ya you can have guns...just kidding psych-eth!lol
damn 45-0 vote lolol
 

matab14

pop up and do less....
Established Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
1,701
Location
So. IL
This state and all the town in it are beyond corrupt! And if this isn't solid evidence, I don't know what is!!!
 

thomas91169

# of bans = 5203
Established Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
25,662
Location
San Diego, CA
SCOTUS should just overturn this as well, tell them "make another law and you will all be put in jail for treason". I dont see how these ****ers get away with straight up telling the supreme court to take the law of the land and shove it.

Sorry, federal laws > local and state laws.
 

Silver2003Cobra

US Navy (retired)
Established Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2002
Messages
5,683
Location
Epping, ND
don't think this will get to the Supreme Court, but it will (and probably already has) had lawsuits filed against it, since it's going against the will not of just the 2nd Amendment, but the Supreme Court..
 

SolarYellow

Sensei
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
9,643
Location
Scranton, PA
Would anyone here feel sorry for the mayor or the schmucks who voted for this ordinance if they became the victims of some sort of crime with a firearm? I think I'd probably chuckle.
 

FX4 SAPPER

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
2,671
Location
Trondheim
The only thing i can see that isnt going to stand up is the one gun at a time part. thats non sense. Other than that, these new restrictions do not keep you from owning a handgun therefore arent technically breaking any law. I hope the NRA gets in the business of killing for hire and starts taking these ****ing idiots out who think guns are evil.
 

SVT4ME

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Messages
14,620
Location
Las Vegas
Problem is this will take the courts time and money when it would be better spent throwing the criminals in jail. All these laws ever do is punish the law abiding citizen.
 

Freakingstang

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2009
Messages
761
Location
Akron, OH
Wow, that is pretty rough...Obama's little busy bees are hard at the communism transistion. It's a shame, Chicago USED to be an awesome city. I'll keep my guns out in the sticks, away from the drama, thank you.
 

Junior00

Hurter Of Delicate Vaginas
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
2,586
Location
Ga
The only thing i can see that isnt going to stand up is the one gun at a time part. thats non sense. Other than that, these new restrictions do not keep you from owning a handgun therefore arent technically breaking any law. I hope the NRA gets in the business of killing for hire and starts taking these ****ing idiots out who think guns are evil.

Having to keep the weapon locked even with children present is in direct conflict with the Scotus ruling in the Heller case, so I know that will be tossed, however the rest of them are up in the air. I don't have a problem with wanting to have citizens go through a gun course, but the rest is just absurd with the difficulty it puts on the average joe. Maybe Daley will get shot by a gang banger with one of his own pistols.
 

Stroszek

Goes to 11
Established Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
2,550
Location
Down by the River
The Chicago political machine seems more interested in protecting itself from the citizens than it is in protecting the citizens from the criminal element.
 

Mr. Mach-ete

Liberals Suck
Established Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2004
Messages
12,801
Location
DelMarVa
Maybe the good folks of Chicago, Illinois will rise up, like the rest of the country is going to, and vote out these Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Democrats this November. 45-0... give me a great big F'n break.
 
Last edited:

jimmy77

Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
385
Location
seattle
I find it interesting that a city feels its rights trump the constitution. (which the supreme court upheld) Wonder what would happen if a state decided to ban abortion...which the Constitution say NOHING about....they'd wine about their "Consitutional" rights. They ought to be arrested. There are plenty of places in this world that they can move to that do ban guns. To think Obama cut his teeth in this filth....
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top