The thing is, even if the bottom line is that he's guilty and deserving of being behind bars, I think the key take away of the documentary is that the case was handled improperly and very suspiciously on the part of the courts and law enforcment - not just little mistakes either like people forgetting to sign in to the crime scene log, but blatant mishandling and tampering of evidence, questionable use of the term "beyond a scientific reasonable doubt" when claiming it was scientifically provable that all 6 blood samples in the RAV4 didn't contain EDTA when only 3 we're actually tested, etc.
If Avery and Dassey are guilty (and I'm actually inclined to believe they are) then I'm certainly glad they're not out in society. That said, looking beyond the verdict, even if it was a result information outside I the documentary, I think what the documentary did show that can't be offset by outside information is some obvious corruption and behind the scenes hand shaking that should never occur in the justice system that has no place in court, politics, or law enforcement.
Again, either way if Avery and Dassey ought to be behind bars, then I'm glad, but looking passed that there were still so many things that made me think "hmm"...
If Avery and Dassey are guilty (and I'm actually inclined to believe they are) then I'm certainly glad they're not out in society. That said, looking beyond the verdict, even if it was a result information outside I the documentary, I think what the documentary did show that can't be offset by outside information is some obvious corruption and behind the scenes hand shaking that should never occur in the justice system that has no place in court, politics, or law enforcement.
Again, either way if Avery and Dassey ought to be behind bars, then I'm glad, but looking passed that there were still so many things that made me think "hmm"...