NASA telescope discovers large artificial object orbiting a star

[Planter]

Nasa's Kepler telescope has discovered what is thought to be an artificially constructed object orbiting a star about 1500 years away.

http://ufoholic.com/nasas-kepler-te...al-structure-orbiting-a-star-in-our-vicinity/

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...structures-orbiting-a-star-near-a6693886.html

 

[mnewxcv]

well I'm not going to waste any time....

 

[JetmechF16]

I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords.

 

[thomas91169]

They dont know what it is, but its not a planet due to how long the "object" covers up the sun from our perspective.

I have no doubt we will find out its something natural but that little part of me still hopes its some sort of manufactured structure to collect solar energy. Though knowing that that civilization is likely far gone and we are looking at their past.

 

[BlckBox04]

lol, god I could make such a bad comment right now

 

[Russo]

I guess NASA's funding is coming up for renewal soon..

 

[03Sssnake]

I guess NASA's funding is coming up for renewal soon..

NASA should get more funding, as things are they get 0.5% of the federal budget, that's pitiful.

 

[03cobra#694]

Lol at the comments in the first link.

 

[James Snover]

Completely incorrect headlines written by uneducated journalists. All they can say is that something regularly partially eclipses the light from the star in a manner we have not otherwise observed, yet. They do not know if it is natural, artificial, or just Riddla's massive johnson playing hide the salami with a black hole.

 

[VerySneaky]

Nasa's Kepler telescope has discovered what is thought to be an artificially constructed object orbiting a star about 1500 years away.

http://ufoholic.com/nasas-kepler-te...al-structure-orbiting-a-star-in-our-vicinity/

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...structures-orbiting-a-star-near-a6693886.html

There is no reference in either of those articles to a NASA report. just heresay...

 

[Rainmaker]

 

[mc01svt]

This is definitely a major concern. If it is what i suspect, we are in big trouble. :nono:

 

[thomas91169]

wtf is that?

Completely incorrect headlines written by uneducated journalists. All they can say is that something regularly partially eclipses the light from the star in a manner we have not otherwise observed, yet. They do not know if it is natural, artificial, or just Riddla's massive johnson playing hide the salami with a black hole.

It could very well be the presence of a RMJ (Riddla's Massive Johnson) in orbit around the sun.....

 

[GT Premi]

Just in time for all the new Star Wars movie hype. Death Star comments will surely abound across the internet.

 

[mc01svt]

Just in time for all the new Star Wars movie hype. Death Star comments will surely abound across the internet.

Not sure if deathstar, unicron or galactus, need further analysis :read:

 

[nxhappy]

 

[coolcobramatt]

Back to the Future predicted a Cub's World Series win, not this.

 

[Double"O"]

This is definitely a major concern. If it is what i suspect, we are in big trouble. :nono:

View attachment 53216

View attachment 53217

View attachment 53218

Unicron....son of a bitch...

 

[mnewxcv]

Back to the Future predicted a Cub's World Series win, not this.

Aliens are more likely.

 

[jbs$]

To say the cause of the light blockage is unusual and/or unknown would be accurate. To say that it is artificial when the star in question is over 1,500 light years away and is barely visible with our best equipment, is the utterance of a fool.