Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Articles and News
Front Page Articles
No Replacement for Displacement | Is it Time for a 5.7L Tall-Deck Coyote???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="me32" data-source="post: 16079719" data-attributes="member: 34543"><p>The cost of developing has already been shared. At this point you dont need to share the 5.0 with the truck division. Which the 5.0 is now alot less trucks. The 2.7 has become the leading number of the engine options for the trucks. </p><p></p><p>Being the fact that the 5.7 would share alot of the same features as the 5.0 it could easily be done. Mind you im not a fan of the mt82 and its flaws.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="me32, post: 16079719, member: 34543"] The cost of developing has already been shared. At this point you dont need to share the 5.0 with the truck division. Which the 5.0 is now alot less trucks. The 2.7 has become the leading number of the engine options for the trucks. Being the fact that the 5.7 would share alot of the same features as the 5.0 it could easily be done. Mind you im not a fan of the mt82 and its flaws. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Articles and News
Front Page Articles
No Replacement for Displacement | Is it Time for a 5.7L Tall-Deck Coyote???
Top