Really? This Qualifies For "Stand Your Ground"

Once you understand the law. Everything else will follow. Just because you feel one way doesn't mean your right

 

This isnt CA. Different laws apply in different states. No matter how you feel about it.

 

Maybe , maybe not. Time will tell.

 

Coward or not. Your still dead and your family no longer has you. Think before you act.

 

Moral of the story...... Keep you hands of other people and if you aren't handicap you have no business parking in a handicap parking place. I'm NOT agreeing with the shooting though. It was WRONG and there was no need for someone to get shot and killed.

 

The real issue with the Sheriff’s POV is HIS interpretation of the law in FL. This is the problem since the SYG in FL is not as defined as other states. It does not necessarily mean the everyone including other LEOs will come to the same conclusion.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

In this case, add in the presence of a mother and children of the victim at the scene......you get the sympathy factor and public outcry.

If the shooter does appeal the conviction, he has that hill to climb as well.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

He DIDN’T apply his POV. The determination was made based on the facts. Don’t be mad at the sheriff, be mad at the law.

 

I don’t feel that when you conceal carry, you should give up your right to call out people in the wrong. No one should put their hands on you for speaking your mind. Whether you like what the other person is saying or not.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

 

Yes....he did apply his POV which is HIS interpretation of the law. Im not mad at the Sheriff. The law and how it is written in FL puts LEOs into this position.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

We are gonna agree to disagree.

 

This is one of many articles on the internet referring to the Sheriff and HIS interpretation of the law, which is his POV.

Even the NRA Disagrees With Florida Sheriff Who Cited “Stand Your Ground” in Parking-Space Killing

Again, the written law puts him in the position where his interpretation can be scrutinized.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

Thank you for the guidance. Now that you have defined it for me, I will better know how to behave in public.

No one has the right to put hands on you for speaking. Period. Put your hands on enough people and you are gonna win the Russian lotto.

 

First line into the article, I noticed them using “sheriff who chose not to arrest a WHITE gun owner who killed a BLACK man”..... Not reading that race baiting article. Sorry, but not sorry.

Of course... Let’s make it about race now.

 

That defeats the whole purpose of conceal carry.

Drejka could have left his handgun in his vehicle. Drejka could have also proceeded to get assaulted to the point of death.

You really think that the guy was going to stop, had Drejka not pulled out a hand gun?

Tell me you don’t see him inching forward after the shove, with his fists still clenched?

All it could have taken to kill or seriously injure Drejka was a good swift kick to the head, while he tried to get back on his feet.

If that was your dad, are you willing to roll the dice with his life? I’m sure as shit not.

All it takes is one good hit and you can **** someone’s life up.

 

No one deserves to be assaulted.

If you think that assaulting an older weaker guy is justified because he hurt your feelings (or your wife’s) while voicing his opinion due to you pulling a punk-bitch move (parking on handicapped spaces), I give not two shits about your death.