Not a bad idea.
Should be the same for the military too.
And all the “disabled” vets too.
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
This Cop Has Obviously Spent A Lot Of Time At The Range!
- Thread starter GNBRETT
- Start date
Not a bad idea.
Should be the same for the military too.
And all the “disabled” vets too.
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
lol… you’re hitting where it hurts bro…..
video evidence of half the “shift” would have many of our great bros never leaving the rank of private….
p.s: disability is a joke… the ones who deserve it, aint getting their rightful cut, if any…. and the ones who don't, get ALL the monies!
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2017
- Messages
- 975
The shooter was good (very good). It was the partner's actions that were dicey.
Nothing, unless one doesn't think a police officer deserves the same constitutional protections that criminals do.
explain to me how you arrived at that conclusion, with me saying that all of the shifts should be recorded?
its just a camera… not gonna lean one way or the other… no different than working at a facility with surveillance…
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2017
- Messages
- 975
GNBRETT already explained it to you. I can't understand it for you.
thats a great line bro…. Guess if i did some fishy shit, i’d be scared of a camera too….
Cop haters always tell us how it "should" be.
thats were you are WRONG, kiddo. 100% law enforcement supporter here.
the kill on this video was legit. Never questioned that.
camera protects EVERYONE and keeps everyone legit.
some of you dumb mofos are acting like i said, raid the officer’s home, confiscate his personals, detain him without rights for an attorney, etc.
GTFO.
I agree with Zyborg here.
Camera stays on. If the officer needs to share private information with his superior, he should keep his mouth shut and wait to talk with the investigation team with his lawyer and union rep.
Cops should not have more rights then the public. If I had shot that guy and the police should up, everything I did and said at the scene would be recorded.
As for the shoot.
Good shooting, but I'm not happy about it. It worked out, he hit his target - but he was shooting in an innocent neighborhood with no idea what was behind the bush/tree line. Could have easily missed and caused collateral damage (see the 14yr/old killed in the California Mall).
The optics of the post shoot are also pretty awful. Dudes on the ground hand cuffed and bleeding out as everyone just mills about with their thumbs in their vests. "Anyone got an ice pack?"
I KNOW it's SOP and "for the officers safety" and I KNOW "**** around and find out" - but it needs to change. Same shit killed Floyd and kicked off the summer of love.
Camera stays on. If the officer needs to share private information with his superior, he should keep his mouth shut and wait to talk with the investigation team with his lawyer and union rep.
Cops should not have more rights then the public. If I had shot that guy and the police should up, everything I did and said at the scene would be recorded.
As for the shoot.
Good shooting, but I'm not happy about it. It worked out, he hit his target - but he was shooting in an innocent neighborhood with no idea what was behind the bush/tree line. Could have easily missed and caused collateral damage (see the 14yr/old killed in the California Mall).
The optics of the post shoot are also pretty awful. Dudes on the ground hand cuffed and bleeding out as everyone just mills about with their thumbs in their vests. "Anyone got an ice pack?"
I KNOW it's SOP and "for the officers safety" and I KNOW "**** around and find out" - but it needs to change. Same shit killed Floyd and kicked off the summer of love.
not “ice pack”… “IFAK”… individual first aid kit. FYI.
Dude’s shooting could been a terrible decision (based on possible collateral damage), if he wasnt on point, which he was. Definitely a risky choice but it paid off for him.
There was no real win there, since it would also have been a bad idea to not shoot and allowing the perp to go into people’s homes with a handgun.
Pretty tough being a legit cop, no doubt about it.
Hahahahaha. Was I referencing you? It's already been explained to you how the real world works. Your "should" is just your opinion. No basis in fact or even common sense...... Kiddie
okay, numbnuts! You know exactly who you were hinting to… have some stones and say it with your chest.
seems to me that you need a class on basic reading comprehension and critical thinking… you must be one of them below 82 ASVAB, mofos.
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2017
- Messages
- 975
The difference is that you cannot be compelled to say anything, the cop can and will be.
Pretty common theme at play here. Guy has a gun, is ordered to stop and show hands and he makes the fatal decision to run, in an "innocent" neighborhood. What if he had originally just complied, do we really think we would be talking about any of this?
Know your target and what is beyond it.
Worked out great... This Time
Cop accidentally shoots baby, kills carjacking suspect at Texas gas station: police
A Texas mother making a quick stop at a gas station had no idea her baby would be shot in the head just moments later. The woman’s 1-year-old son was recovering Friday after a police officer …
www.nydailynews.com
Fearing Family Dog, Cop Accidentally Shoots 4-Year-Old Girl
On Friday, an Ohio woman sought aid from a police officer who subsequently shot her 4-year-old niece while attempting to shoot their charging family dog, the New York Daily News reports.
www.gawker.com
LAPD releases video of store shooting in which officer's bullet killed teen bystander
The department posted an edited video package that included 911 calls, radio transmissions, body camera footage and surveillance video from the shooting at a store crowded with holiday shoppers.
www.npr.org
Cop Who Accidentally Shot 10-Year-Old When Aiming For Family Dog Can’t Be Sued, Federal Court Rules
Created by the Supreme Court, “qualified immunity” lets government officials dodge federal civil-rights lawsuits.
www.forbes.com
Texas Police Fatally Shoot Six-Year-Old Boy
He became the youngest person shot dead by police in 2017.
www.newsweek.com
Says who?
Oh I agree with you there. You should NEVER move forward of an active muzzle if it can be helped.
Thankfully the partner was never in any danger thanks to his buddy who obviously knows what he is doing.
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2017
- Messages
- 975
Attachments
So you acknowledge there is no law, policy or rule that strips law enforcement of their 5th Amendment Rights? Because that was your claim.
Users who are viewing this thread
