X5M drags a 6.4L Scat Pack Challenger

[SVTSR]

 

[xblitzkriegx]

cool, an expensive tt awd suv that was modded kept up with a stock muscle car.

 

[Khan]

Poor challengers. It's always a rape inside a rape...

 

[_Snake_]

cool, an expensive tt awd suv that was modded kept up with a stock muscle car.

Being able to consistently run low 12's in a SUV with a piggyback tune (~ 50 hp) and exhaust is pretty cool IMHO, especially with all the creature comforts. Nothing against the Challenger.

 

[blk02edge]

cool, an expensive tt awd suv that was modded kept up with a stock muscle car.

Funny how the fists come up when anything srt gets beats here. Its just a race man

 

[xblitzkriegx]

Being able to consistently run low 12's in a SUV with a piggyback tune (~ 50 hp) and exhaust is pretty cool IMHO, especially with all the creature comforts. Nothing against the Challenger.

kinda what i was getting at. its just a really f'ing expensive way to run a low 12.

Funny how the fists come up when anything srt gets beats here. Its just a race man

who's fighting? i didnt say the challenger shouldve won nor did i make excuses. all i did was point out the truth. get mad somewhere else.

also, the title is extremely misleading. i wouldnt call seven hundredths of a second "dragging" anything.

 

[me32]

kinda what i was getting at. its just a really f'ing expensive way to run a low 12.
who's fighting? i didnt say the challenger shouldve won nor did i make excuses. all i did was point out the truth. get mad somewhere else.

also, the title is extremely misleading. i wouldnt call seven hundredths of a second "dragging" anything.

Solid point. I have to agree.

 

[blk02edge]

kinda what i was getting at. its just a really f'ing expensive way to run a low 12.
who's fighting? i didnt say the challenger shouldve won nor did i make excuses. all i did was point out the truth. get mad somewhere else.

also, the title is extremely misleading. i wouldnt call seven hundredths of a second "dragging" anything.

Dunno how you could possibly extract anger from my post and not your own lol.

Its cool because we have fast vehicles in all genres these days

 

[2KBlackGT]

Solid run from a stock 392!

 

[Booky]

Poor challengers. It's always a rape inside a rape...

12.19 to 12.12 ......what video were you watching? lol

Now if either vehicle in that video raced this Trackhawk, I would agree with the "rape" statement.

 

[Blk04L]

Always cool to me seeing a fast SUV. No matter how many of them are around now.

 

[CobraBob]

That X5M with mods was making 625 hp and weighs 5260 lbs. (stock weight). The Scat Back Challenger makes 485 hp and weighs 4232 lbs. About a 1,000 lb. difference.

Stock, the X5M records a 12.2 @ 114 1/4 mile according to published tests. In this run, the X5M with tune and exhaust mods (making an additional 58hp) ran 12.12 @ 115. The Scat Pack, stock, has reported runs from 11.7 @ 115 to 12.6 @ 112 from various sources. It ran a 12.19 @ 113 in this race. So as the fog lifts, this video 1/4 mile run was about what I expected. And it was a close race.

I'd like to own a Scat Pack Challenger. As a weekend fun ride. A solid performer that's affordable. Still good looking, too.

 

[98 svt]

Being able to consistently run low 12's in a SUV with a piggyback tune (~ 50 hp) and exhaust is pretty cool IMHO, especially with all the creature comforts. Nothing against the Challenger.

Cool yes, but not really impressive in today's standards.

 

[_Snake_]

Cool yes, but not really impressive in today's standards.

Agreed, especially when there’s 10 second Trackhawk’s.

 

[brad65ford]

Kind of agree. I always enjoy stock to stock and modded to modded when comparing. BTW my stock GLC c63s Coupe ran 11.8 & 115 stock which imo is impressive for an suv no tune or exhaust required. That challenger did good with tire only though.