Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Al Gore seems to be winning his fictitious war
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="*TK*" data-source="post: 9903598" data-attributes="member: 48732"><p>What flavor Kool-Aid are you currently drinking???</p><p></p><p></p><p>What pisses me off is that this "California Enviornmental Protection Agency - Air Resources Board" uses the term "<strong>Global Warming Score</strong>." There is not one shred of <strong><span style="font-size: 12px">DIRECT</span></strong> scientific evidence that Human's are facilitating the effect of rising temperature's across the globe. This false premise has been deductively used to derive the term "Global Warming". Just like Al Gore and all of the BS that he spews, the term Global Warming is now just thrown around and <u><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong>assumed</strong></span></u> to be scientific fact. </p><p></p><p></p><p>(Layman's terms: you can't create a term and pass it off to be fact if the argument that that it is based from is false or has not been proven to be fact.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>I would have no problem if they put a sticker inside of a new car that listed all of the exhaust gases and labeled what percentage or PPM's (Parts Per Million) of the specific gas a particular car was giving off in relation to others. Then, if they so felt, they could make reference to whatever <strong><span style="font-size: 12px">direct scientific</span> </strong>correlations they would like to emphasize. But do not emphasize a term that has been proven to be at the very most, moderatly hypothetical. </p><p></p><p>"SMOG" I am ok with, "Global Warming" I am not.</p><p></p><p>With masses of people seeing this term used everyday more and more people are beginning to believe/ASSUME that "Global Warming" is scientific fact, and it sickens me... Not like my re-vised version of this sticker would at all change my own decision if I bought the car or not, BUT at least then it would be <u><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong>factual</strong></span></u>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="*TK*, post: 9903598, member: 48732"] What flavor Kool-Aid are you currently drinking??? What pisses me off is that this "California Enviornmental Protection Agency - Air Resources Board" uses the term "[B]Global Warming Score[/B]." There is not one shred of [B][SIZE="3"]DIRECT[/SIZE][/B] scientific evidence that Human's are facilitating the effect of rising temperature's across the globe. This false premise has been deductively used to derive the term "Global Warming". Just like Al Gore and all of the BS that he spews, the term Global Warming is now just thrown around and [U][SIZE="3"][B]assumed[/B][/SIZE][/U] to be scientific fact. (Layman's terms: you can't create a term and pass it off to be fact if the argument that that it is based from is false or has not been proven to be fact.) I would have no problem if they put a sticker inside of a new car that listed all of the exhaust gases and labeled what percentage or PPM's (Parts Per Million) of the specific gas a particular car was giving off in relation to others. Then, if they so felt, they could make reference to whatever [B][SIZE="3"]direct scientific[/SIZE] [/B]correlations they would like to emphasize. But do not emphasize a term that has been proven to be at the very most, moderatly hypothetical. "SMOG" I am ok with, "Global Warming" I am not. With masses of people seeing this term used everyday more and more people are beginning to believe/ASSUME that "Global Warming" is scientific fact, and it sickens me... Not like my re-vised version of this sticker would at all change my own decision if I bought the car or not, BUT at least then it would be [U][SIZE="3"][B]factual[/B][/SIZE][/U]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Al Gore seems to be winning his fictitious war
Top