Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2015+ Shelby GT350 Mustang
Giving away my msrp alocation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ChiSVT" data-source="post: 15443690" data-attributes="member: 28706"><p>You gotta pick one. : D</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't, motor sits low and towards the firewall. Overhead cams would mean they'd have to rethink the whole design. </p><p></p><p>They should have just done an LT7! A redone 427 would have been perfect.</p><p></p><p>As far as the 5.2l's motor charactistics, I prefer them as well, but that's a subjective statement. Having owned an lsx car in the past, the 5.2l is way more satisfying in terms of sound, refinement, the speed of revs and the power curve that never seems to peak even after reaching the limiter.</p><p></p><p>It's a unique experience.</p><p></p><p>But in all fairness, the lt and ls engines are not broken. Huge power potential on pump gas, more torque, (which our porkly mustangs could use more of) it's light, cheap to repair, cheap to mod and more efficient. It would be very illogical and unnecessary for GM to try and develop a DOHC for the current Corvette.</p><p></p><p>Ford picked their route in 1996 and GM committed to theirs in 1997 with the ls1. It took Ford until 2011 to finally start doing something right with the Coyote.</p><p></p><p>Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ChiSVT, post: 15443690, member: 28706"] You gotta pick one. : D I wouldn't, motor sits low and towards the firewall. Overhead cams would mean they'd have to rethink the whole design. They should have just done an LT7! A redone 427 would have been perfect. As far as the 5.2l's motor charactistics, I prefer them as well, but that's a subjective statement. Having owned an lsx car in the past, the 5.2l is way more satisfying in terms of sound, refinement, the speed of revs and the power curve that never seems to peak even after reaching the limiter. It's a unique experience. But in all fairness, the lt and ls engines are not broken. Huge power potential on pump gas, more torque, (which our porkly mustangs could use more of) it's light, cheap to repair, cheap to mod and more efficient. It would be very illogical and unnecessary for GM to try and develop a DOHC for the current Corvette. Ford picked their route in 1996 and GM committed to theirs in 1997 with the ls1. It took Ford until 2011 to finally start doing something right with the Coyote. Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2015+ Shelby GT350 Mustang
Giving away my msrp alocation
Top