Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Engine Specific Forums
EcoBoost Engines
Let the ecoboost modding begin!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="blainestang" data-source="post: 8749259" data-attributes="member: 7839"><p>I've been saying that for a while, now. Ecoboost 4 or 6, standard TrackPak, and a few other things, and you've got a new SVO. I'd buy one of either the 4 or 6 in a heartbeat.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The '11 GT is getting a 5.0L V8 making ~400hp. The EcoBoost 3.5TT in Longitudinal RWD format will make notably more than the SHO does, but IMO for a special edition car that is differentiated in other ways from the GT, I think it's OK that they make similar peak HP numbers.</p><p></p><p></p><p>2) The V8 Mustang GT gets better city/highway mileage than the "eco" boost v6. According to Motor Trend, the SHO taurus with "eco" boost gets 17/25 city/highway MPG and the Mustang GT gets 18/26 city/highway.</p></blockquote><p></p><p>Like you mentioned, the Mustang would get MUCH better gas mileage than the Taurus does with the same engine.</p><p></p><p>- The Taurus SHO weighs 4300lb... 700-800lb more than an EcoBoost Mustang.</p><p>- The Taurus SHO is exclusively AWD.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="blainestang, post: 8749259, member: 7839"] I've been saying that for a while, now. Ecoboost 4 or 6, standard TrackPak, and a few other things, and you've got a new SVO. I'd buy one of either the 4 or 6 in a heartbeat. The '11 GT is getting a 5.0L V8 making ~400hp. The EcoBoost 3.5TT in Longitudinal RWD format will make notably more than the SHO does, but IMO for a special edition car that is differentiated in other ways from the GT, I think it's OK that they make similar peak HP numbers. 2) The V8 Mustang GT gets better city/highway mileage than the "eco" boost v6. According to Motor Trend, the SHO taurus with "eco" boost gets 17/25 city/highway MPG and the Mustang GT gets 18/26 city/highway.[/quote] Like you mentioned, the Mustang would get MUCH better gas mileage than the Taurus does with the same engine. - The Taurus SHO weighs 4300lb... 700-800lb more than an EcoBoost Mustang. - The Taurus SHO is exclusively AWD. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Engine Specific Forums
EcoBoost Engines
Let the ecoboost modding begin!
Top