Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
-pics- HDR pics of the 10th
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bubbrubb" data-source="post: 7042689" data-attributes="member: 26007"><p>Me too, thats why its 1st <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Photomatix HDR's have a lot more <em>pop</em> than what I've been able to make in CS3's feature. CS3 seems to come out as a relatively bland picture, where as the photomatix versions come out darker, more saturated, and much more vivid - all of which can be changed depending on how dramatic you want it to look, which I prefer. With CS3 I use local adaptation and don't play with the curves too much, dunno if that is where I went wrong or not, but I've found photomatix to give me better results and more tweaking within the tone mapping feature. Like I said, I may very well be using the cs3 program wrong. If I am, let me know where I'm going wrong!! :beer:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bubbrubb, post: 7042689, member: 26007"] Me too, thats why its 1st :) Photomatix HDR's have a lot more [I]pop[/I] than what I've been able to make in CS3's feature. CS3 seems to come out as a relatively bland picture, where as the photomatix versions come out darker, more saturated, and much more vivid - all of which can be changed depending on how dramatic you want it to look, which I prefer. With CS3 I use local adaptation and don't play with the curves too much, dunno if that is where I went wrong or not, but I've found photomatix to give me better results and more tweaking within the tone mapping feature. Like I said, I may very well be using the cs3 program wrong. If I am, let me know where I'm going wrong!! :beer: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
-pics- HDR pics of the 10th
Top