Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Science nerds. Richard Dawkins and Neil deGrasse Tyson have a discussion.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dsg04MACHone" data-source="post: 11576603" data-attributes="member: 105097"><p>That makes sense. He didn't come right out and say he has ruled out the option completely or anything, just figured with it not being a topic at all with his way of reasoning that it would've came up even in the slightest if he has not entirely ruled that out.</p><p></p><p>He seems to think about things outside of the norm, and on one side you have people that believe there was something greater that created us and everything we know, on the other hand you have people that believe that that the laws of physics and natural selection took its course after the big bang.</p><p></p><p>And with those 2 being the norm of where people stand on that subject, why is it not possible the 2 coincide? It just surprised me with the topic they were on and his method of reasoning I guess that he didn't take it there in some sort of way.</p><p></p><p> I wish the audience would have asked better questions, I mean they had ti know for a while that they were coming and they could have the possibility to ask them a question giving them plenty of time to come up with something.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dsg04MACHone, post: 11576603, member: 105097"] That makes sense. He didn't come right out and say he has ruled out the option completely or anything, just figured with it not being a topic at all with his way of reasoning that it would've came up even in the slightest if he has not entirely ruled that out. He seems to think about things outside of the norm, and on one side you have people that believe there was something greater that created us and everything we know, on the other hand you have people that believe that that the laws of physics and natural selection took its course after the big bang. And with those 2 being the norm of where people stand on that subject, why is it not possible the 2 coincide? It just surprised me with the topic they were on and his method of reasoning I guess that he didn't take it there in some sort of way. I wish the audience would have asked better questions, I mean they had ti know for a while that they were coming and they could have the possibility to ask them a question giving them plenty of time to come up with something. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Science nerds. Richard Dawkins and Neil deGrasse Tyson have a discussion.
Top