Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
The Toronto hearings. 9/11 investigation.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hb712" data-source="post: 11651415" data-attributes="member: 42038"><p>What more do I need to come up with? Let's start with some early history, because you referenced that earlier. Ok, how about we all go read some Prokopios to see how scandal comes out (I'm talking about his <em>Secret History</em>, not <em>Wars</em>. I'll let you wrap your small mind around that and we can reconvene later. Maybe after a while we can move to some scandals in modern history (i.e., Iran Contra, etc...).</p><p></p><p>If you have a history degree, I want to know where you got it. I really want to make sure I never recommend that anyone attend a school that gives history degrees to people who clearly have no capacity to analyze sources or determine causation vs correlation. You see, mine (will be completed this quarter after I finish language, so my history courses are already done) is from a good university with an outstanding history department. Luckily, I actually learned how to research without moronic biases. It would appear that you did not actually learn anything about real history.</p><p></p><p>P.S. You contradicted your very first sentence, you did "bother."</p><p></p><p></p><p>Do you actually know what a theory is? If you accept theories as a basis for a conclusion, you more than likely cannot accurately answer my question. This has nothing to do with knowing everything, it has to do with the inability of truthers, like yourself, to grasp basic concepts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hb712, post: 11651415, member: 42038"] What more do I need to come up with? Let's start with some early history, because you referenced that earlier. Ok, how about we all go read some Prokopios to see how scandal comes out (I'm talking about his [I]Secret History[/I], not [I]Wars[/I]. I'll let you wrap your small mind around that and we can reconvene later. Maybe after a while we can move to some scandals in modern history (i.e., Iran Contra, etc...). If you have a history degree, I want to know where you got it. I really want to make sure I never recommend that anyone attend a school that gives history degrees to people who clearly have no capacity to analyze sources or determine causation vs correlation. You see, mine (will be completed this quarter after I finish language, so my history courses are already done) is from a good university with an outstanding history department. Luckily, I actually learned how to research without moronic biases. It would appear that you did not actually learn anything about real history. P.S. You contradicted your very first sentence, you did "bother." Do you actually know what a theory is? If you accept theories as a basis for a conclusion, you more than likely cannot accurately answer my question. This has nothing to do with knowing everything, it has to do with the inability of truthers, like yourself, to grasp basic concepts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
The Toronto hearings. 9/11 investigation.
Top