sooo... you aren't going to track the car i guess.
if you don't track the car get the gt and cnc port the heads.
the reasons i got the shelby weren't the power.
It was
1. the chassis
2. the sound
3. the transmission
If you want shear speed. the gen 3 coyote with a 10 speed destroys a...
Hi, I agree that the valve-train was probably modeled to 9500rpm.
If you think that engine ever had a prayer of being in a production, emissions passing car....
What's the colloquialism i'm looking for...
I have a bridge i'm looking to sell in Brooklyn
IMHO i don't really like centrifugal superchargers that much, but for a 8200rpm car that could be jekyl and hyde depending on RPM range... I would definitely do the centrifugal supercharger. If i was spending lots of time on a road course i would do the centrifugal supercharger for the linear...
it would be interesting to see if this calibration brings the 350 and the R closer together on handling feel with a similar tire package.
I mean many people put the carbon wheels on the wall/in the attic/ as living room furniture as soon as they show up and functionally those wheels and the...
Its not just serious its factually how the stuff works man. i'm not saying lets compare it as a 3.1 liter... (unless comparing to a wankle cause that damned thing is effectively a 2 stroke [nostroke]) i'm just saying at 100% volumetric efficiency... that's all she eats in a single revolution so...
No, that is not how positive displacement superchargers work. you see, the 6.2 liter only fires every other rotation so is functionally only a 3.1 liter and then the drive ratio (2.36:1) on the 2.4 liter supercharger is what crams 5.664 liters of air into that 3.1 liter engine and makes...