Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
01 cobra vs 2000 camaro SS? who do you think would win
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tt335ci03cobra" data-source="post: 12657838" data-attributes="member: 68944"><p>Seriously? Dude I get that you like your car but step back and read/use a little reasoning. I'm not bashing srt8's bud, I'm saying that altitude makes na v8's run way slower.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Let me say it very clear bud, up here at 4,300 ft of altitude, bone stock srt8's, camaro ss gen 5's, c6 vettes and 03 cobras run bottom 14's at 102-105.</p><p></p><p>I can't compare those times or any times that I see with my own eyes in real life to times others are running at sea level otherwise I'd be way way off.</p><p></p><p>To clarify, up here, cobalt ss's run 14.9's - 15.5's stock depending on the driver. Obviously that's way off what the v8 guys are running.</p><p></p><p>My point was that if I compared motortrends times to what cars are running up here, the v8 cars are barely keeping up with sea level cobalts so obviously real world track time in real life aren't what I'm going to go off of because we are way to high up here for the times to matter.</p><p></p><p>I went turbo because of the shitty altitude, haven't looked back since.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tt335ci03cobra, post: 12657838, member: 68944"] Seriously? Dude I get that you like your car but step back and read/use a little reasoning. I'm not bashing srt8's bud, I'm saying that altitude makes na v8's run way slower. Let me say it very clear bud, up here at 4,300 ft of altitude, bone stock srt8's, camaro ss gen 5's, c6 vettes and 03 cobras run bottom 14's at 102-105. I can't compare those times or any times that I see with my own eyes in real life to times others are running at sea level otherwise I'd be way way off. To clarify, up here, cobalt ss's run 14.9's - 15.5's stock depending on the driver. Obviously that's way off what the v8 guys are running. My point was that if I compared motortrends times to what cars are running up here, the v8 cars are barely keeping up with sea level cobalts so obviously real world track time in real life aren't what I'm going to go off of because we are way to high up here for the times to matter. I went turbo because of the shitty altitude, haven't looked back since. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
01 cobra vs 2000 camaro SS? who do you think would win
Top