Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
2011 GT finally hits the street!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="69gt4speed" data-source="post: 9786594" data-attributes="member: 7772"><p>As usual the gm guys cannot refute my premise that a lsx was designed by robert yates and it was based on the sbf and the ford fe w cross bolt mains. Ford was the first in in 62 w the 406 fe. I don't really care, in fact it flatters me as a ford guy. But don't tell me its God's gift. It has good and bad like all engines stock.</p><p></p><p>If lsx head fits directly on a sbf what does that tell you? Someone copied the best of fords stuff. So if Robert Yates was hired it makes perfect sense why it is that way or the greatest coincidence since winning the powerball. I don't refute it is not lighter and a lil more refined compared to either sbf or the fe. Either one can make serious hp. But sure not in same league as this coyote design for hp and mpg. You can change basically the cam w programming, a 5 min deal. We just need to figure it out as 50 deg is available. Yea the lift is not variable just the lsa and duration. </p><p></p><p> Yea I wish the coyote bore spacing was like 4.4" then you gm guys be really whining w like 550 rwhp n/a. But yea ford cut costs and 5.0L is about max w 100mm bore spacing cause of the stupid Lincoln fwd app back when. Btw the lsx intake bolts are same as sbf, also vertical bolt pattern in a lsx, you ford guys need to check what I said cause I'm way to old to bs....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="69gt4speed, post: 9786594, member: 7772"] As usual the gm guys cannot refute my premise that a lsx was designed by robert yates and it was based on the sbf and the ford fe w cross bolt mains. Ford was the first in in 62 w the 406 fe. I don't really care, in fact it flatters me as a ford guy. But don't tell me its God's gift. It has good and bad like all engines stock. If lsx head fits directly on a sbf what does that tell you? Someone copied the best of fords stuff. So if Robert Yates was hired it makes perfect sense why it is that way or the greatest coincidence since winning the powerball. I don't refute it is not lighter and a lil more refined compared to either sbf or the fe. Either one can make serious hp. But sure not in same league as this coyote design for hp and mpg. You can change basically the cam w programming, a 5 min deal. We just need to figure it out as 50 deg is available. Yea the lift is not variable just the lsa and duration. Yea I wish the coyote bore spacing was like 4.4" then you gm guys be really whining w like 550 rwhp n/a. But yea ford cut costs and 5.0L is about max w 100mm bore spacing cause of the stupid Lincoln fwd app back when. Btw the lsx intake bolts are same as sbf, also vertical bolt pattern in a lsx, you ford guys need to check what I said cause I'm way to old to bs.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
2011 GT finally hits the street!
Top