Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
2014 GT500 vs. 2004 EVO
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jroc" data-source="post: 13747077" data-attributes="member: 51847"><p>I think the EVO should take the win, but a stock EVO couldn't sleep the new v6 Mustangs either. The new v6 Mustangs seem to be able to run times real similar to a 01-04 L. They are a mid to high 13 second cars stock so they aren't a slow car for what they are which is the bottom, budget Mustang. Hell just 10 years ago a car running in the 13's was a pretty damn strong running car.</p><p></p><p>People are exaggerating and over-simplifying how easy, and cheap it is to go out and beat a 662 BHP Mustang that runs as strong as a stock C6Z in a roll race. I think most people on this site have a good appreciation for what a EVO is. They are badass little cars with huge potential. Someone said that the 4G63 is the Japanese equivalent to a 350 SBC and I disagree. A 350 SBC is very inferior to modern day v8's. If I was to compare the 4G63 to an American v8 then it would be a Terminators motor. It's a iron block, and overbuilt motor for its factory HP, and it will handle a ton of boost, and HP on it's factory motor before having to go built. It is the I4 equivalent to a I6 2JZ-GTE. Still a 13/14 GT500 is a very fast highway roll car even stock, and beating one with a car making well under half the HP in factory forum is not just a snap of your fingers away. Often times people exaggerate how cheap and easy it is to reach X HP goal. Terminator owners are terrible about this. You'll hear stuff like, "I can spend $2K and make over 500 WHP on a otherwise stock car." It might can be done, but it's likely going to end up costing more in reality unless you just have good connections, and are a patent and smart shopper.</p><p></p><p>If this thread was to have been a "I lost to a EVO with $10K in mods in a 70 MPH roll race in my stock 13/14 GT500" then it wouldn't have surprised me. At the same time it should come as no surprise to anyone that a stock 13/14 GT500 beat a EVO VIII/IX with $10K in mods in a roll race. A new GT500 is just too fast for it to be a given. Would people be calling BS if it was a stock C6Z vs a EVO with $10K in mods? It seems like some people who don't own a Ford often like to come on here just to keep people that do hump like everyone on here just has a big head about a Ford car or something, and in doing so they always insult the cars that this niche site caters to. Sometimes you win and sometime you don't I guess. </p><p></p><p>There is no guarantee that a EVO with $10K in mods will beat a stock GT500 or vice versa. It makes me think back to when the C6Z first came out. Sometime they would beat a TS Terminator in stock forum, and sometime a TS Terminator would beat them. A stock C6Z was a good matchup for your typical TS Terminator.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jroc, post: 13747077, member: 51847"] I think the EVO should take the win, but a stock EVO couldn't sleep the new v6 Mustangs either. The new v6 Mustangs seem to be able to run times real similar to a 01-04 L. They are a mid to high 13 second cars stock so they aren't a slow car for what they are which is the bottom, budget Mustang. Hell just 10 years ago a car running in the 13's was a pretty damn strong running car. People are exaggerating and over-simplifying how easy, and cheap it is to go out and beat a 662 BHP Mustang that runs as strong as a stock C6Z in a roll race. I think most people on this site have a good appreciation for what a EVO is. They are badass little cars with huge potential. Someone said that the 4G63 is the Japanese equivalent to a 350 SBC and I disagree. A 350 SBC is very inferior to modern day v8's. If I was to compare the 4G63 to an American v8 then it would be a Terminators motor. It's a iron block, and overbuilt motor for its factory HP, and it will handle a ton of boost, and HP on it's factory motor before having to go built. It is the I4 equivalent to a I6 2JZ-GTE. Still a 13/14 GT500 is a very fast highway roll car even stock, and beating one with a car making well under half the HP in factory forum is not just a snap of your fingers away. Often times people exaggerate how cheap and easy it is to reach X HP goal. Terminator owners are terrible about this. You'll hear stuff like, "I can spend $2K and make over 500 WHP on a otherwise stock car." It might can be done, but it's likely going to end up costing more in reality unless you just have good connections, and are a patent and smart shopper. If this thread was to have been a "I lost to a EVO with $10K in mods in a 70 MPH roll race in my stock 13/14 GT500" then it wouldn't have surprised me. At the same time it should come as no surprise to anyone that a stock 13/14 GT500 beat a EVO VIII/IX with $10K in mods in a roll race. A new GT500 is just too fast for it to be a given. Would people be calling BS if it was a stock C6Z vs a EVO with $10K in mods? It seems like some people who don't own a Ford often like to come on here just to keep people that do hump like everyone on here just has a big head about a Ford car or something, and in doing so they always insult the cars that this niche site caters to. Sometimes you win and sometime you don't I guess. There is no guarantee that a EVO with $10K in mods will beat a stock GT500 or vice versa. It makes me think back to when the C6Z first came out. Sometime they would beat a TS Terminator in stock forum, and sometime a TS Terminator would beat them. A stock C6Z was a good matchup for your typical TS Terminator. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
2014 GT500 vs. 2004 EVO
Top