Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
2014 GT500 vs. 2004 EVO
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kaz109" data-source="post: 13754494" data-attributes="member: 55075"><p>First of all I agree that not everybody needs a 500hp vette or GT500 to have fun, hence the BRZ/FR-S. It is a sports car that is a blast to drive. I still don't think you are understanding the difference in the class/category where are debating. Just because the V6 mustang is faster does not mean it is a sports car/performance car...hence why as poppacap and your article stated it has a rev limiter set at 114mph and not the eco tires. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Secondly about my " ford hate"...You can not quote one negative thing in this thread towards a base V6 mustang or a GT500, Your "look at this thread for example" rant did not state that I said one negative comment about a GT500. It said that I felt a Evo with 10k in performance mods shouldn't have a problem beating a stock GT500. So because I feel a well modded car should beat a stock car that is bashing the stock car? :shrug:</p><p></p><p>The reasoning behind your ford hater statement has zero logic behind it. </p><p></p><p>So did my last post make sense to you? I will say it again....</p><p></p><p>Vette= sports car</p><p>Viper= sports car</p><p>911= sports car</p><p>BRZ/FR-S sports car</p><p></p><p>Mustang GT and Shelby= Performance versions of the base Eco V6</p><p>Evo and Sti= performance versions of the base NA 4cyl</p><p>Camaro SS/1L3/ZR1= performance versions of the base Eco V6</p><p></p><p>Do you see the pattern? The argument you are making about the V6 times is not the point and base of what makes a sports car</p><p>Viper</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kaz109, post: 13754494, member: 55075"] First of all I agree that not everybody needs a 500hp vette or GT500 to have fun, hence the BRZ/FR-S. It is a sports car that is a blast to drive. I still don't think you are understanding the difference in the class/category where are debating. Just because the V6 mustang is faster does not mean it is a sports car/performance car...hence why as poppacap and your article stated it has a rev limiter set at 114mph and not the eco tires. Secondly about my " ford hate"...You can not quote one negative thing in this thread towards a base V6 mustang or a GT500, Your "look at this thread for example" rant did not state that I said one negative comment about a GT500. It said that I felt a Evo with 10k in performance mods shouldn't have a problem beating a stock GT500. So because I feel a well modded car should beat a stock car that is bashing the stock car? :shrug: The reasoning behind your ford hater statement has zero logic behind it. So did my last post make sense to you? I will say it again.... Vette= sports car Viper= sports car 911= sports car BRZ/FR-S sports car Mustang GT and Shelby= Performance versions of the base Eco V6 Evo and Sti= performance versions of the base NA 4cyl Camaro SS/1L3/ZR1= performance versions of the base Eco V6 Do you see the pattern? The argument you are making about the V6 times is not the point and base of what makes a sports car Viper [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
2014 GT500 vs. 2004 EVO
Top