Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
5.0 vs challenger 392
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="assasinator" data-source="post: 10987122" data-attributes="member: 105188"><p>im not a big fan of the rediculous hype and whirl wind about the 392, but i do believe its .1 faster on average stock for stock. the 392 hooks well because of its rear weight, and mid range acceleration is really good. </p><p></p><p></p><p>there is so much fudging going on to be "king of stock" that who really knows. </p><p></p><p>3600 vs. 4160 is a big advantage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="assasinator, post: 10987122, member: 105188"] im not a big fan of the rediculous hype and whirl wind about the 392, but i do believe its .1 faster on average stock for stock. the 392 hooks well because of its rear weight, and mid range acceleration is really good. there is so much fudging going on to be "king of stock" that who really knows. 3600 vs. 4160 is a big advantage. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
5.0 vs challenger 392
Top