Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
6.2 F-150 vs Ecoboost F150
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dusten" data-source="post: 11410885" data-attributes="member: 38972"><p>My 3.5 Ecoboost towed my lightning over two different mountain passes and averaged 12.6mpg on the total trip, but when doing 65 on flatish ground i was seeing 13.2mpg.</p><p></p><p></p><p>thats the first tuner i've seen, even Livernois told me they haven't got the tune down just yet.</p><p></p><p></p><p>and the added maintenance and fuel costs that are almost .70 a gallon where i live, no thanks.</p><p>I had a diesel, and got rid of it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Mine stickered at 48k</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not really, this is the first test i've seen where the 6.2 beat the ecoboost. But for a motor almost twice the size and with 51 more hp, it should be faster.</p><p></p><p>Here is a quote from pickuptrucks.com</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>it ran 14.4 with and without the tune... fastlane didnt do shit there.</p><p></p><p></p><p>you mean like diesel trucks do? People bitch and and moan, a 6 cyl isn't made to work, turbo's are terrible with towing, direct injection is stupid.</p><p></p><p>But 6 cyl direct injection turbo diesels have been around for how long? Grow up...</p><p></p><p>Its not lag most people feel, its the drive by wire not letting you slam the throttle open, the new diesels are the same way</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dusten, post: 11410885, member: 38972"] My 3.5 Ecoboost towed my lightning over two different mountain passes and averaged 12.6mpg on the total trip, but when doing 65 on flatish ground i was seeing 13.2mpg. thats the first tuner i've seen, even Livernois told me they haven't got the tune down just yet. and the added maintenance and fuel costs that are almost .70 a gallon where i live, no thanks. I had a diesel, and got rid of it. Mine stickered at 48k Not really, this is the first test i've seen where the 6.2 beat the ecoboost. But for a motor almost twice the size and with 51 more hp, it should be faster. Here is a quote from pickuptrucks.com it ran 14.4 with and without the tune... fastlane didnt do shit there. you mean like diesel trucks do? People bitch and and moan, a 6 cyl isn't made to work, turbo's are terrible with towing, direct injection is stupid. But 6 cyl direct injection turbo diesels have been around for how long? Grow up... Its not lag most people feel, its the drive by wire not letting you slam the throttle open, the new diesels are the same way [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
6.2 F-150 vs Ecoboost F150
Top