Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2013-14 Shelby GT500
adjustable vs non-adj LCA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Van@RevanRacing" data-source="post: 13534651" data-attributes="member: 69847"><p>Adjustables let you zero the thrust angle which reduces oversteer when the car breaks traction. There are many that freak out when the rear end of their car starts to articulate left or right due to the thrust angle being off. The more thrust angle you have the worse the amount of oversteer potential you can induce.</p><p></p><p>That is the sole purpose of the adjustable rear LCA's IMO. Reducing oversteer creates a more controlled vehicle.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Van@RevanRacing, post: 13534651, member: 69847"] Adjustables let you zero the thrust angle which reduces oversteer when the car breaks traction. There are many that freak out when the rear end of their car starts to articulate left or right due to the thrust angle being off. The more thrust angle you have the worse the amount of oversteer potential you can induce. That is the sole purpose of the adjustable rear LCA's IMO. Reducing oversteer creates a more controlled vehicle. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2013-14 Shelby GT500
adjustable vs non-adj LCA
Top