Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Driveline/Suspension
Aluminum PHB vs. Steel PHB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tob" data-source="post: 12285410" data-attributes="member: 83412"><p>You are taking things way too personally. If you can't handle praise then so be it. There's no snarkiness intended.</p><p></p><p>I stand behind everything I said. And you have no idea of my 'knowledge' so maybe come down off your high horse and accept the fact that there are others around the world that can comprehend simple 'engineering' concepts.</p><p></p><p>Interesting facts, not sure why you felt the need to state them. As to your last 'fact'...</p><p></p><p></p><p>And I'm capable of flying. How's that for a general statement? Did anyone say that friction couldn't? Care to be more specific so that we can address the subject of an aluminum panhard versus a steel one?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Another generic statement. Care to provide specifics in the context of an S197 chassis including suspension setup for a given example?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Do you know what a straw man is? </p><p></p><p>Lars, if you want to discuss materials 101, that's great. If you'd like to engage into deeper conversation involving vehicle dynamics (with respect to the panhard bar in an S197 chassis) and how steel/aluminum is affected by load under certain circumstances (varying degrees of bind at a given pivot point or bushing) then I'm, all for it.</p><p></p><p>In the meantime, have you found that example of aluminum panhard bar failure yet?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tob, post: 12285410, member: 83412"] You are taking things way too personally. If you can't handle praise then so be it. There's no snarkiness intended. I stand behind everything I said. And you have no idea of my 'knowledge' so maybe come down off your high horse and accept the fact that there are others around the world that can comprehend simple 'engineering' concepts. Interesting facts, not sure why you felt the need to state them. As to your last 'fact'... And I'm capable of flying. How's that for a general statement? Did anyone say that friction couldn't? Care to be more specific so that we can address the subject of an aluminum panhard versus a steel one? Another generic statement. Care to provide specifics in the context of an S197 chassis including suspension setup for a given example? Do you know what a straw man is? Lars, if you want to discuss materials 101, that's great. If you'd like to engage into deeper conversation involving vehicle dynamics (with respect to the panhard bar in an S197 chassis) and how steel/aluminum is affected by load under certain circumstances (varying degrees of bind at a given pivot point or bushing) then I'm, all for it. In the meantime, have you found that example of aluminum panhard bar failure yet? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Driveline/Suspension
Aluminum PHB vs. Steel PHB
Top