Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Betelgeuse is getting active
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="James Snover" data-source="post: 8699171" data-attributes="member: 67454"><p>I don't think we will ever see such a thing. It would be neat to be wrong, but I think that theory is trying to explain GRB's in terms of omnidrectional radiation, as opposed to beam-confined radiation. It would be neat, because if it is real, then yes, free quarks pack more energy than matter-antimatter reactions, the only thing (I know of) that could do so.</p><p></p><p>Jim Snover</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="James Snover, post: 8699171, member: 67454"] I don't think we will ever see such a thing. It would be neat to be wrong, but I think that theory is trying to explain GRB's in terms of omnidrectional radiation, as opposed to beam-confined radiation. It would be neat, because if it is real, then yes, free quarks pack more energy than matter-antimatter reactions, the only thing (I know of) that could do so. Jim Snover [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Betelgeuse is getting active
Top