Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
GT40
Ford GT
C6 Z06 vs. FGT vs. SRTC. *Edmunds review*
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jman20427" data-source="post: 3145513" data-attributes="member: 11235"><p>I think the heads will need a little more umph then what they have if they wanna support an NA cam that goes at 8k. Even with valvetrain upgrades and support to .700 lift, you need alot of CFM out of those heads to get that baby moving at 8 thou. Im not sure off hand what they flow out of the box. Dont get me wrong, the car will go fine at 8k with these heads, but to maximize the cam potential, you need more, like 350+, probably more.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jman20427, post: 3145513, member: 11235"] I think the heads will need a little more umph then what they have if they wanna support an NA cam that goes at 8k. Even with valvetrain upgrades and support to .700 lift, you need alot of CFM out of those heads to get that baby moving at 8 thou. Im not sure off hand what they flow out of the box. Dont get me wrong, the car will go fine at 8k with these heads, but to maximize the cam potential, you need more, like 350+, probably more. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
GT40
Ford GT
C6 Z06 vs. FGT vs. SRTC. *Edmunds review*
Top