Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Constitutionality of DWI checkpoints?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="exdeath" data-source="post: 8733170" data-attributes="member: 56343"><p>The absolute sole purpose of government is the preservation of individual liberty. The conflict arises when you attempt to protect the liberty of individuals who have a right to be in public places without being endangered by reckless individuals, while simultaneously not violating the liberty of random individuals suspected of doing something they haven't.</p><p></p><p>Obviously the source of the conflict is mass preemptive all or nothing enforcement and mass surveillance on anonymous whole groups of innocent citizens in the hopes that you will catch someone, rather than focused profiling of individual drunk drivers. And this is related directly to the principle of "pre-crime" or "stopping a crime that never happened", which is NOT how our system is supposed to work.</p><p></p><p>An example of the difference would be like checking everyone's pockets and treating them as thieves as they leave a store, just in case, vs. only those who set off the detector.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="exdeath, post: 8733170, member: 56343"] The absolute sole purpose of government is the preservation of individual liberty. The conflict arises when you attempt to protect the liberty of individuals who have a right to be in public places without being endangered by reckless individuals, while simultaneously not violating the liberty of random individuals suspected of doing something they haven't. Obviously the source of the conflict is mass preemptive all or nothing enforcement and mass surveillance on anonymous whole groups of innocent citizens in the hopes that you will catch someone, rather than focused profiling of individual drunk drivers. And this is related directly to the principle of "pre-crime" or "stopping a crime that never happened", which is NOT how our system is supposed to work. An example of the difference would be like checking everyone's pockets and treating them as thieves as they leave a store, just in case, vs. only those who set off the detector. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Constitutionality of DWI checkpoints?
Top