Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2015+ S550 Mustangs
2015+ S550 Mustang Talk
Could the new S550 outperform Chevys new C7 for nearly half the cost?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="germeezy1" data-source="post: 13762070" data-attributes="member: 38526"><p>At this point I would be pleasantly surprised if any weight savings came to fruition, and tickled pink if it was over 100 lbs. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't own a GM product....at all......but own two Ford products....I am not a GM boy....I am a CAR ENTHUSIAST....which means not a Ford Mustang only enthusiast. Did you just use the Amsoil engine master challenge which was a focus on engines alone ( not inside of actual cars ) to prove your point about modulars? </p><p></p><p>Your post does not take into account things that they should teach in Auto Shop 101, and quite frankly I can't begin to answer how many things are wrong with what you said. </p><p></p><p>HP per liter is ricer math, and should only be used as a reference in displacement limited classes. The bottom line is tha the LSx , and LTx engines offer more cubic inches for no more physical size and/ or weight which is never a bad thing to real car enthusiasts. </p><p></p><p><strong>I have owned Modular, and LSx cars so I know first hand that modular engines do not have a better powerband. </strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="germeezy1, post: 13762070, member: 38526"] At this point I would be pleasantly surprised if any weight savings came to fruition, and tickled pink if it was over 100 lbs. I don't own a GM product....at all......but own two Ford products....I am not a GM boy....I am a CAR ENTHUSIAST....which means not a Ford Mustang only enthusiast. Did you just use the Amsoil engine master challenge which was a focus on engines alone ( not inside of actual cars ) to prove your point about modulars? Your post does not take into account things that they should teach in Auto Shop 101, and quite frankly I can't begin to answer how many things are wrong with what you said. HP per liter is ricer math, and should only be used as a reference in displacement limited classes. The bottom line is tha the LSx , and LTx engines offer more cubic inches for no more physical size and/ or weight which is never a bad thing to real car enthusiasts. [B]I have owned Modular, and LSx cars so I know first hand that modular engines do not have a better powerband. [/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2015+ S550 Mustangs
2015+ S550 Mustang Talk
Could the new S550 outperform Chevys new C7 for nearly half the cost?
Top