Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
Demon on the Loose...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tt335ci03cobra" data-source="post: 15656145" data-attributes="member: 68944"><p>Fourcam, I completely agree that a singular scenario, such as the tr3160 in a gt350 and camaro v6, is not enough empirical data to draw such a conclusion. What cannot be discredited is the mathematical fact that an exact amount of torque (force) is needed to turn an exact amount of rotations within that transmission assuming similar fluids and freedom to spin (like what is connect to the transmission and drivetrain etc.</p><p></p><p>I've drawn that conclusion from seeing exactly the same results on many engine swap/trans swap/dyno stock/modded etc examples over the last 10 years.</p><p></p><p>I don't have easy access to proper equipment to test the notion, but as a proudly flawed human, I stand by the idea.</p><p></p><p>Look at the import scene. Those engines are far more susceptible to drivetrain loss. 10tq on a 200wtq b16 Honda is hugely noticeable, and lots of dyno testing on small engines has shown the difference between various transmission losses, etc.</p><p></p><p>Interesting note, transmission fluid can impact transmission loss decently. One thing i read about 4 years ago showed back to back a 3000gt picking up something like 7whp and 5wtq on the dyno with some then new transmission fluid that was formulated for heat resistance and decreased frictional whatever. It was new regular transmission fluid vs that stuff so not just old vs new. It may have been a 300zx, I honestly forget.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tt335ci03cobra, post: 15656145, member: 68944"] Fourcam, I completely agree that a singular scenario, such as the tr3160 in a gt350 and camaro v6, is not enough empirical data to draw such a conclusion. What cannot be discredited is the mathematical fact that an exact amount of torque (force) is needed to turn an exact amount of rotations within that transmission assuming similar fluids and freedom to spin (like what is connect to the transmission and drivetrain etc. I've drawn that conclusion from seeing exactly the same results on many engine swap/trans swap/dyno stock/modded etc examples over the last 10 years. I don't have easy access to proper equipment to test the notion, but as a proudly flawed human, I stand by the idea. Look at the import scene. Those engines are far more susceptible to drivetrain loss. 10tq on a 200wtq b16 Honda is hugely noticeable, and lots of dyno testing on small engines has shown the difference between various transmission losses, etc. Interesting note, transmission fluid can impact transmission loss decently. One thing i read about 4 years ago showed back to back a 3000gt picking up something like 7whp and 5wtq on the dyno with some then new transmission fluid that was formulated for heat resistance and decreased frictional whatever. It was new regular transmission fluid vs that stuff so not just old vs new. It may have been a 300zx, I honestly forget. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
Demon on the Loose...
Top