Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
Demon on the Loose...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fourcam380" data-source="post: 15656202" data-attributes="member: 185249"><p>As you may have ascertained, I don't disagree with you in that I also believe that the standards of 15-17.5-18-20% etc are no longer as accurate as they once may have been. However I can't sit here and say what they are or should be simply because I haven't spent any real time testing the theory, nor can I throw out even ballpark numbers or what should be for the same reason. </p><p></p><p>Also and just as importantly. There are lots of things and junctions of these things that eat energy aside from the trans. They all vary in size, weight, as well as moment of inertia. What I'm saying is I don't understand how someone can get so specific about the assumptions made to one part of the puzzle but completely negate the value of the contributions or inefficiencies of the rest of the driveline as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fourcam380, post: 15656202, member: 185249"] As you may have ascertained, I don't disagree with you in that I also believe that the standards of 15-17.5-18-20% etc are no longer as accurate as they once may have been. However I can't sit here and say what they are or should be simply because I haven't spent any real time testing the theory, nor can I throw out even ballpark numbers or what should be for the same reason. Also and just as importantly. There are lots of things and junctions of these things that eat energy aside from the trans. They all vary in size, weight, as well as moment of inertia. What I'm saying is I don't understand how someone can get so specific about the assumptions made to one part of the puzzle but completely negate the value of the contributions or inefficiencies of the rest of the driveline as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
Demon on the Loose...
Top