Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
End Rolling Stone Magazine
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="xblitzkriegx" data-source="post: 13283241" data-attributes="member: 105608"><p>the content is irrelevant. if youre offended by the cover then dont buy the mag. its that simple. no one is kicking in homeowners doors and forcing people to read it. i totally get that it appears that rolling stone is glorifying him based on the content of the cover. </p><p></p><p>what i meant by differing view is that not everyone thinks the mag should be ended over a cover photo even if it is crass. if enough people are upset about it, sales will suffer and the mag will end. its not been very good in a long time anyways.</p><p></p><p>i think its perfectly fine to speak out against it. i dont agree with it either. its pathetic on every level. that doesnt mean the mag should be ended because some panties have been waded. </p><p></p><p>i know exactly what it was designed to do, generate interest and sell issues to make money. you cant exactly vilify them for that, they need to make money. obviously they chose a less than desirable way to do so. lol. </p><p></p><p>finally, if you dont like it, dont buy it. it really is that simple. </p><p></p><p>p.s. aforementioned is one word. :thumbsup: jussa lil snarky comment for ya.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="xblitzkriegx, post: 13283241, member: 105608"] the content is irrelevant. if youre offended by the cover then dont buy the mag. its that simple. no one is kicking in homeowners doors and forcing people to read it. i totally get that it appears that rolling stone is glorifying him based on the content of the cover. what i meant by differing view is that not everyone thinks the mag should be ended over a cover photo even if it is crass. if enough people are upset about it, sales will suffer and the mag will end. its not been very good in a long time anyways. i think its perfectly fine to speak out against it. i dont agree with it either. its pathetic on every level. that doesnt mean the mag should be ended because some panties have been waded. i know exactly what it was designed to do, generate interest and sell issues to make money. you cant exactly vilify them for that, they need to make money. obviously they chose a less than desirable way to do so. lol. finally, if you dont like it, dont buy it. it really is that simple. p.s. aforementioned is one word. :thumbsup: jussa lil snarky comment for ya. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
End Rolling Stone Magazine
Top