Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
EPA to Start Aggressively Enforcing Emission Defeat Devices
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Makobra" data-source="post: 16355388" data-attributes="member: 193575"><p>well first of all I've only been arguing against what is realistic. nuke from orbit is plausible but not realistic.</p><p>second, requiring a command to shut down a car is not the same thing as requiring a command to allow the car to continue running.</p><p></p><p>1. onstar works like this: </p><p>vehicle receives command to shut off. vehicle shuts off.</p><p></p><p>2. the proposed orwellian police state fantasy works like this: </p><p>vehicle is going to shut off UNLESS it receives command to not shut off.</p><p></p><p>now, don't cheap out and pretend like I'm ignoring the rest of your post like other people like to do. </p><p>this is a matter of first importance because your argument is built on the idea that this exists in the wild today.</p><p></p><p>it doesn't. now, question for ya, do you think thing 1 and thing 2 are the same things?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Makobra, post: 16355388, member: 193575"] well first of all I've only been arguing against what is realistic. nuke from orbit is plausible but not realistic. second, requiring a command to shut down a car is not the same thing as requiring a command to allow the car to continue running. 1. onstar works like this: vehicle receives command to shut off. vehicle shuts off. 2. the proposed orwellian police state fantasy works like this: vehicle is going to shut off UNLESS it receives command to not shut off. now, don't cheap out and pretend like I'm ignoring the rest of your post like other people like to do. this is a matter of first importance because your argument is built on the idea that this exists in the wild today. it doesn't. now, question for ya, do you think thing 1 and thing 2 are the same things? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
EPA to Start Aggressively Enforcing Emission Defeat Devices
Top