Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Fed reports household debt increases faster than any time in the past 20 yrs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="black4vcobra" data-source="post: 16846488" data-attributes="member: 82394"><p>Now I'm certainly not one to say that children should go hungry but we've gone past the point of "helping people" to straight enabling them. </p><p></p><p>I'm 38 and when I was in school there was no such thing as school breakfast. Yes, some kids got free lunches and I'm ok with that for the people who really needed it.</p><p></p><p>If you think about it though, taxpayers are paying for these children to eat twice, once through food stamps and once with school provided breakfast/lunch/snack. If these people can't keep cereal and milk on hand with their income or food stamps then they should be deemed as unfit parents and possibly have their children removed from their home unless they shape up. </p><p></p><p>Parents still have the ultimate responsibility for their children and the state providing so much help in raising/paying for the children enables people to keep popping out kids they can't afford with little consequences for it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="black4vcobra, post: 16846488, member: 82394"] Now I'm certainly not one to say that children should go hungry but we've gone past the point of "helping people" to straight enabling them. I'm 38 and when I was in school there was no such thing as school breakfast. Yes, some kids got free lunches and I'm ok with that for the people who really needed it. If you think about it though, taxpayers are paying for these children to eat twice, once through food stamps and once with school provided breakfast/lunch/snack. If these people can't keep cereal and milk on hand with their income or food stamps then they should be deemed as unfit parents and possibly have their children removed from their home unless they shape up. Parents still have the ultimate responsibility for their children and the state providing so much help in raising/paying for the children enables people to keep popping out kids they can't afford with little consequences for it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Fed reports household debt increases faster than any time in the past 20 yrs
Top