Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Ford Explorer (or other mid size SUV's) ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve@TF" data-source="post: 16572904" data-attributes="member: 40308"><p>you owned an I6 YJ/TJ wrangler and think the new one feels cheap? lol. if you want a fancy/nice wrangler i would suggest a loaded Sahara.</p><p></p><p>i went from an Explorer Sport to a Wrangler Sport. the Explorer was loaded with all the high tech, leather, dual sunroofs, etc.. it was a sick suv no doubt. we actually got rid of it for a suburban, then i picked up the wrangler. the explorer was just too narrow for 3 people in the 2nd row, when one is in a car seat. and we often used all three rows. we loved it though. i love the Sport and ST. the lesser models looking a bit boring to me with the black trim..</p><p></p><p>a wrangler shouldnt be compared to a family suv like an explorer. its an off road machine that people try to make into a DD/soccer mom mobile. i test drove JK and JL back to back and we could immediately tell the upgrade in driveability and interior quality on the JL. the wrangler still has about as much cargo space as a porsche 911 lol. unless of course you fold the rear seats down and pack shit to the roof. </p><p></p><p>check out the grand cherokee. those are nice. we were going to check out the Telluride as well. due to short supply, dealers are asking stupid money for them though, unless its just the base model. </p><p>my mother recently picked up a CX7. we test drove everything in that class and the mazda was by far the most impressive. compared to new RAV4 (blah), CRV and hundai. the CX9 should be just as nice, only bigger.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve@TF, post: 16572904, member: 40308"] you owned an I6 YJ/TJ wrangler and think the new one feels cheap? lol. if you want a fancy/nice wrangler i would suggest a loaded Sahara. i went from an Explorer Sport to a Wrangler Sport. the Explorer was loaded with all the high tech, leather, dual sunroofs, etc.. it was a sick suv no doubt. we actually got rid of it for a suburban, then i picked up the wrangler. the explorer was just too narrow for 3 people in the 2nd row, when one is in a car seat. and we often used all three rows. we loved it though. i love the Sport and ST. the lesser models looking a bit boring to me with the black trim.. a wrangler shouldnt be compared to a family suv like an explorer. its an off road machine that people try to make into a DD/soccer mom mobile. i test drove JK and JL back to back and we could immediately tell the upgrade in driveability and interior quality on the JL. the wrangler still has about as much cargo space as a porsche 911 lol. unless of course you fold the rear seats down and pack shit to the roof. check out the grand cherokee. those are nice. we were going to check out the Telluride as well. due to short supply, dealers are asking stupid money for them though, unless its just the base model. my mother recently picked up a CX7. we test drove everything in that class and the mazda was by far the most impressive. compared to new RAV4 (blah), CRV and hundai. the CX9 should be just as nice, only bigger. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Ford Explorer (or other mid size SUV's) ?
Top