Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
James Webb Telescope Launch and updates
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="James Snover" data-source="post: 16712978" data-attributes="member: 67454"><p>You're more correct than you may realize. _IF_ inflation happened in the very few first nanoseconds of the universe's existence*, we don't really know how big it may be. Because all we can see, due the limit of the speed of light and the expansion of the universe, we can only observe the 93-billion light-year "sphere." And we only see that much as a side-effect of the universe's expansion.** Otherwise, we'd only see a 26-billion light year sphere. </p><p></p><p>*There's lots of evidence to support Guth's Theory of Inflation. So far it is the leading contender for explaining the universe we see. But some heavy hitters in astronomy have always disagreed with the Theory of Inflation.</p><p></p><p>** The expansion of the universe has always been attributed to Edwin Hubble. However, for his entire life, he said what he discovered was a way to explain the red-shift of light from farther distances. He himself never supported, nor disagreed with, the idea that the red-shift was caused by expansion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="James Snover, post: 16712978, member: 67454"] You're more correct than you may realize. _IF_ inflation happened in the very few first nanoseconds of the universe's existence*, we don't really know how big it may be. Because all we can see, due the limit of the speed of light and the expansion of the universe, we can only observe the 93-billion light-year "sphere." And we only see that much as a side-effect of the universe's expansion.** Otherwise, we'd only see a 26-billion light year sphere. *There's lots of evidence to support Guth's Theory of Inflation. So far it is the leading contender for explaining the universe we see. But some heavy hitters in astronomy have always disagreed with the Theory of Inflation. ** The expansion of the universe has always been attributed to Edwin Hubble. However, for his entire life, he said what he discovered was a way to explain the red-shift of light from farther distances. He himself never supported, nor disagreed with, the idea that the red-shift was caused by expansion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
James Webb Telescope Launch and updates
Top