Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Special Interests and Events
Open Track Racing
K member/alignment questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BlackBolt9" data-source="post: 6393279" data-attributes="member: 36489"><p>Actually his post did help. He explained that the control arms were too short to get the correct amount of camber because UPR designs their arms to "work" with any year fox chassis even though on the newer cars it reduces track width. If this doesn't explain to you why he can't get enough camber you need think about the design of the suspension some more.</p><p></p><p>As far as calling the parts crap: If the shoe fits wear it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BlackBolt9, post: 6393279, member: 36489"] Actually his post did help. He explained that the control arms were too short to get the correct amount of camber because UPR designs their arms to "work" with any year fox chassis even though on the newer cars it reduces track width. If this doesn't explain to you why he can't get enough camber you need think about the design of the suspension some more. As far as calling the parts crap: If the shoe fits wear it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Special Interests and Events
Open Track Racing
K member/alignment questions
Top