Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Blower Bistro
Kenne Bell 2.6 or Wipple 140ax?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IamMike" data-source="post: 4515625" data-attributes="member: 47758"><p>I'd like to hear more from Whipple owners on the sound factor. I've been reading and reading and doing more reading on the different SC's out there, and have settled into a twin screw as the logical choice, at least for me. From what I gather reading different things about the KB and WP looking at dyno's the power and boost from them won't be noticeable. Esp for someone running a stock engine looking for more power w/o having to do up the internals ect. Even then it would seem as someone mentioned, according to dyno sheets I've seen, it's gonna take quite a bit to tilt anything in WP's direction, and w/ the new "H" from KB that may be a moot point.</p><p></p><p>Whipple is coming in more expensive of the 2, but from what I read you get better customer service plus less hassle w/ oil issues. KB's website is much better and more informative as far as numbers and dyno sheets. Crappy support in finding authorized installers. </p><p></p><p>Whipple's website is pretty sucky. Of course as I type this I was trying to get on their site and its not loading.....</p><p></p><p>neither is cheap, but both seem to be the superior blower to Paxton's and other diff types of blowers. </p><p></p><p>I'm really interested in how much different whipple's sound. I wish I could listen to a comparision. I can't get on whipple's site yet, but IIRC don't they offer a longer warranty than the 1 yr from KB? that is def food for thought as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IamMike, post: 4515625, member: 47758"] I'd like to hear more from Whipple owners on the sound factor. I've been reading and reading and doing more reading on the different SC's out there, and have settled into a twin screw as the logical choice, at least for me. From what I gather reading different things about the KB and WP looking at dyno's the power and boost from them won't be noticeable. Esp for someone running a stock engine looking for more power w/o having to do up the internals ect. Even then it would seem as someone mentioned, according to dyno sheets I've seen, it's gonna take quite a bit to tilt anything in WP's direction, and w/ the new "H" from KB that may be a moot point. Whipple is coming in more expensive of the 2, but from what I read you get better customer service plus less hassle w/ oil issues. KB's website is much better and more informative as far as numbers and dyno sheets. Crappy support in finding authorized installers. Whipple's website is pretty sucky. Of course as I type this I was trying to get on their site and its not loading..... neither is cheap, but both seem to be the superior blower to Paxton's and other diff types of blowers. I'm really interested in how much different whipple's sound. I wish I could listen to a comparision. I can't get on whipple's site yet, but IIRC don't they offer a longer warranty than the 1 yr from KB? that is def food for thought as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Blower Bistro
Kenne Bell 2.6 or Wipple 140ax?
Top