Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
KingBlack's Coyote Intake Manifold Analysis *SERIOUS DISCUSSION*
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KingBlack" data-source="post: 16007654" data-attributes="member: 23148"><p>thanks. again, this analysis is just my opinion. while it does focus on the intake manifold, the goal wasn't to rank them, but to get a better understanding of why it does so well. Ranking them based on peak values is a valid system, but i wanted to know more than just 4xx hp @ xxxx rpm. Some people only care how much power is made; I care about <span style="color: #b30000">where </span>it is made.</p><p></p><p>Average power is something I don't see a big focus on in many videos. Peak is great, but looking at the values over a range means more. Let's use this to discuss the merits of each item, as they all serve a purpose for different people. The only real knock I have on the 2018 IM is the what happens after 7000 rpms.</p><p></p><p>If I'm using the data to rank them based on Average hp from 5000 to 7400 rpms, then the 2018 numerically, has to be last. Then again, this shouldn't come as a surprise to anybody. And to your point, <span style="color: #ff0000">if the VMP group is being ranked strictly on peak numbers, the ported 2018 is king of the hill. Even over the Cobra Jet. </span>That alone is why I took a closer look at the data.</p><p></p><p>I'll repeat what I, and many others have said: the 2018 is a great value. Hands down. But I will take things a step further and say that it is not the way to go if you plan on adding cams. But, that shouldn't surprise anyone.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KingBlack, post: 16007654, member: 23148"] thanks. again, this analysis is just my opinion. while it does focus on the intake manifold, the goal wasn't to rank them, but to get a better understanding of why it does so well. Ranking them based on peak values is a valid system, but i wanted to know more than just 4xx hp @ xxxx rpm. Some people only care how much power is made; I care about [color=#b30000]where [/color]it is made. Average power is something I don't see a big focus on in many videos. Peak is great, but looking at the values over a range means more. Let's use this to discuss the merits of each item, as they all serve a purpose for different people. The only real knock I have on the 2018 IM is the what happens after 7000 rpms. If I'm using the data to rank them based on Average hp from 5000 to 7400 rpms, then the 2018 numerically, has to be last. Then again, this shouldn't come as a surprise to anybody. And to your point, [color=#ff0000]if the VMP group is being ranked strictly on peak numbers, the ported 2018 is king of the hill. Even over the Cobra Jet. [/color]That alone is why I took a closer look at the data. I'll repeat what I, and many others have said: the 2018 is a great value. Hands down. But I will take things a step further and say that it is not the way to go if you plan on adding cams. But, that shouldn't surprise anyone. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
KingBlack's Coyote Intake Manifold Analysis *SERIOUS DISCUSSION*
Top