Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
KingBlack's Coyote Intake Manifold Analysis *SERIOUS DISCUSSION*
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KingBlack" data-source="post: 16007889" data-attributes="member: 23148"><p>Agreed. the fox that my coyote is going in is not my daily. Hence, what works perfectly for the guy modding his daily isn't perfect for me. Personally, I could lose 40 lb-ft of torque in the Notch on the lower end and it wouldn't matter. and you may want to revisit the data, the gains start at 5000 rpms, and with one exception, the GT350 and CJ makes more hp from there up to 7400 rpms while the 2018 falls off a cliff past 7000. For my build, the goal is to move the powerband up as much and as safely as possible.</p><p></p><p>Don't confuse the analysis as a snapshot of how a car will perform on the streets. Gearing, weight, weather - a number of variables - will help determine the outcome. It is simply a high level report to help in the decision making process. Knowing that pump gas, stock cammed motors, regardless of the intake manifold, is limited to 460 rwhp +-, it helps with the decision of either A) determine if you want to add cams to reach the goal of 500 rwhp on pump gas B) go forced induction, far exceeding your goal of 500 rwhp or C) be happy with 460 rwhp on a stock motor.</p><p></p><p>I'll reiterate, if ranking the manifolds from 5000 to 7400 rpms using average hp, the 2018 makes the least.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KingBlack, post: 16007889, member: 23148"] Agreed. the fox that my coyote is going in is not my daily. Hence, what works perfectly for the guy modding his daily isn't perfect for me. Personally, I could lose 40 lb-ft of torque in the Notch on the lower end and it wouldn't matter. and you may want to revisit the data, the gains start at 5000 rpms, and with one exception, the GT350 and CJ makes more hp from there up to 7400 rpms while the 2018 falls off a cliff past 7000. For my build, the goal is to move the powerband up as much and as safely as possible. Don't confuse the analysis as a snapshot of how a car will perform on the streets. Gearing, weight, weather - a number of variables - will help determine the outcome. It is simply a high level report to help in the decision making process. Knowing that pump gas, stock cammed motors, regardless of the intake manifold, is limited to 460 rwhp +-, it helps with the decision of either A) determine if you want to add cams to reach the goal of 500 rwhp on pump gas B) go forced induction, far exceeding your goal of 500 rwhp or C) be happy with 460 rwhp on a stock motor. I'll reiterate, if ranking the manifolds from 5000 to 7400 rpms using average hp, the 2018 makes the least. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
KingBlack's Coyote Intake Manifold Analysis *SERIOUS DISCUSSION*
Top