Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Legal question regarding Police Vehicles without lights on during speed traps
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="silver03svt" data-source="post: 11256592" data-attributes="member: 107540"><p>Again, do you always believe the government is right? Just because somebody gets a lot of people to vote or certain verbage doesn't mean it's correct. In order to "trap" somebody for any type of illegal activity, there has to be a bait there in order to encourage them to break the law. You're missing my whole point in this, I guess bc you're so closed minded, IDK. I could care less what those states have defined as a "speed trap", it's wrong. Those officers writing tickets in those places are not baiting peolpe to speed and them writing them tickets for it. That would be a true "trap". People speeding on their own accord and then getting stopped, no matter where they are, is not trapping them. Are there places around that are more prone to more speeders....absolutely. But no LEO has trapped them. </p><p></p><p>My point with OJ and MJ is that people in those cases broke the law. Does that mean when they were arrested that they were caught in a "trap"? I guess all the states with these laws defining "speed traps" should also define bad areas in their states as "drug traps" or "murder traps".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="silver03svt, post: 11256592, member: 107540"] Again, do you always believe the government is right? Just because somebody gets a lot of people to vote or certain verbage doesn't mean it's correct. In order to "trap" somebody for any type of illegal activity, there has to be a bait there in order to encourage them to break the law. You're missing my whole point in this, I guess bc you're so closed minded, IDK. I could care less what those states have defined as a "speed trap", it's wrong. Those officers writing tickets in those places are not baiting peolpe to speed and them writing them tickets for it. That would be a true "trap". People speeding on their own accord and then getting stopped, no matter where they are, is not trapping them. Are there places around that are more prone to more speeders....absolutely. But no LEO has trapped them. My point with OJ and MJ is that people in those cases broke the law. Does that mean when they were arrested that they were caught in a "trap"? I guess all the states with these laws defining "speed traps" should also define bad areas in their states as "drug traps" or "murder traps". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Legal question regarding Police Vehicles without lights on during speed traps
Top