Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Looks like there are more REAL mean in the UK than the US
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CobraBob" data-source="post: 14988238" data-attributes="member: 6727"><p>I agree that the S550 is bigger all around, and much heavier, compared to the SN95. I did a spec comparison. I'd love to see the next gen Mustang move back to specs closer to the SN95, but that's doubtful. </p><p></p><p><strong><u>2003 Mustang GT Specs</u></strong></p><p>Wheelbase: 101.3" </p><p>Track Front: 60.3"</p><p>Track Rear: 60.3"</p><p>Length: 183.2"</p><p>Width: 73.1"</p><p>Height: 53.1"</p><p>Weight: 3,237 lbs. (GT coupe)</p><p></p><p><strong><u>2015 Mustang GT Specs</u></strong></p><p>Wheelbase: 107.1" (<span style="color: #FFFF00">+5.8"</span>)</p><p>Track Front: 62.3" (<span style="color: #FFFF00">+2.0"</span>)</p><p>Track Rear: 64.9" (<span style="color: #FFFF00">+4.6"</span>)</p><p>Length: 188.3" (<span style="color: #FFFF00">+5.1"</span>)</p><p>Width: 75.4" (<span style="color: #FFFF00">+2.3"</span>)</p><p>Height: 54.4" (<span style="color: #FFFF00">+1.3"</span>)</p><p>Weight: 3,895 lbs. (GT coupe) (<span style="color: #FFFF00">+658 lbs.</span>)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CobraBob, post: 14988238, member: 6727"] I agree that the S550 is bigger all around, and much heavier, compared to the SN95. I did a spec comparison. I'd love to see the next gen Mustang move back to specs closer to the SN95, but that's doubtful. [B][U]2003 Mustang GT Specs[/U][/B] Wheelbase: 101.3" Track Front: 60.3" Track Rear: 60.3" Length: 183.2" Width: 73.1" Height: 53.1" Weight: 3,237 lbs. (GT coupe) [B][U]2015 Mustang GT Specs[/U][/B] Wheelbase: 107.1" ([COLOR="#FFFF00"]+5.8"[/COLOR]) Track Front: 62.3" ([COLOR="#FFFF00"]+2.0"[/COLOR]) Track Rear: 64.9" ([COLOR="#FFFF00"]+4.6"[/COLOR]) Length: 188.3" ([COLOR="#FFFF00"]+5.1"[/COLOR]) Width: 75.4" ([COLOR="#FFFF00"]+2.3"[/COLOR]) Height: 54.4" ([COLOR="#FFFF00"]+1.3"[/COLOR]) Weight: 3,895 lbs. (GT coupe) ([COLOR="#FFFF00"]+658 lbs.[/COLOR]) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Looks like there are more REAL mean in the UK than the US
Top